On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Please see my proto suggestion: a certain class of golem only; cost
> for making that type of golem; don't count towards quorum.
This is similar to what scshunt suggested... on second thought, I suppose it
might be more interesting to have Gole
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Let Golems vote (AI=3)
>
> [Considering that Golems passed, we may as well allow them to do
> something, even if it has only been two years (has it really only been
> that long?) since partnerships were repealed. This extends the
> Rubles-for-votes m
Only got halfway through this last week. Might as well throw it out
there out of my drafts folder, now that omd has beat me to it.
Now to go read omd's...
[Proto: Some golems can vote! But not count towards quorum...
Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending the following
pa
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 14:18 -0700, John Smith wrote:
> I cause BuckyBot to create a Slave Golem named "Ghost" in eir
> posession.
> I cause BuckyBot to transfer Ghost to me.
> I cause Ghost to create a Promise with the text "I register.". I
> cause Ghost to transfer that promise to me.
I approve
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 17:18, John Smith wrote:
>
> I cause BuckyBot to create a Slave Golem named "Ghost" in eir posession.
> I cause BuckyBot to transfer Ghost to me.
> I cause Ghost to create a Promise with the text "I register.". I cause Ghost
> to transfer that promise to me.
> I cause Gho
5 matches
Mail list logo
