Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of 3173, intent to appeal 3172, support for intent to appeal 3151, and support for intents to make cases notable

2012-03-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: This wording is faulty. It seems to say that ANY case can be appealed with 2 support, and cases older than 2 weeks can also be appealed without objection. Rule 1728/32 (Power=3) Dependent Actions A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform an ac

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of 3173, intent to appeal 3172, support for intent to appeal 3151, and support for intents to make cases notable

2012-03-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 23:00, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 21:37 +, FKA441344 wrote: >>> >>> If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support, >>> on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for >>> case 3173. >> >> I suppo

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7187-7190

2012-03-14 Thread Ed Murphy
FKA441344 wrote: 7187 FOR 7188 FOR 7189 PRESENT I spend a ruble to double my voting limit on 7190. 7190 AGAINST These missed the end of the voting period by a little over 2 hours.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3176 judged UNDETERMINED by omd

2012-03-14 Thread omd
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > The actual judgement on the case is not what I'm getting at here, as > it is rather trivial. The purpose of this appeal is to challenge the > process of judges discharging their duties and deliberately assigning > inappropriate opinions on c

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part

2012-03-14 Thread omd
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 14 March 2012 13:16, FSX wrote: >> I am not Mister Snuggles. > > You and everybody else. Posting it to a-b might give it more weight in > the form of the illegality of lying, though. Lying is not illegal anymore.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3176 judged UNDETERMINED by omd

2012-03-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:09, omd wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> I intend, with two support, to appeal this case. I request a with >> prejudice ruling as Judge omd inappropriately discharged eir duties in >> this case. > > Gratuitous: The lack of arguments

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part

2012-03-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 March 2012 13:16, FSX wrote: > I am not Mister Snuggles. You and everybody else. Posting it to a-b might give it more weight in the form of the illegality of lying, though.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part

2012-03-14 Thread FSX
I am not Mister Snuggles. On Mar 14, 24 Heisei, at 12:43 AM, omd wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Mister Snuggles wrote: >> i am not a player. >> >> i register. >> >> cfj arguments: to agora, all nonplayers are interchangeable. >> >> mister snuggles > > Huh, and I always thought

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i am an interchangeable part

2012-03-14 Thread Tanner Swett
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > Can we just drop all messages sent to the lists from mr.snu...@gmail.com? > > (Speaking of which, did anything come of the list hosting thing?) Umm, right. I promised to bring up a new set of mailing lists within a couple of days. And, uh...

Re: DIS: test

2012-03-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 March 2012 11:49, Elliott Hird wrote: > test

DIS: Re: BUS: Yet another identity issue

2012-03-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 March 2012 08:16, Alex Smith wrote: > CFJ: I am Mr. Snuggles. Arguments: Mr. Snuggles uses GMail. ais523 would never use GMail. Trivially FALSE.