On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 23:00, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 21:37 +0000, FKA441344 wrote: >>> >>> If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support, >>> on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for >>> case 3173. >> >> I support and do so. > > > Ineffective, the two-week limit has passed. > > Proposal: Allow late appeals without objection > (AI = 1.7) > > Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by replacing this text: > > An appeal concerning any assignment of judgement in a non-appeal > case within the past two weeks CAN be initiated by any player > with 2 support. > > with this text: > > An appeal concerning any assignment of judgement in a non-appeal > case CAN be initiated by any player with 2 support and (if the > judgement was assigned more than two weeks earlier) without > objection.
This wording is faulty. It seems to say that ANY case can be appealed with 2 support, and cases older than 2 weeks can also be appealed without objection.
