omd wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
7145 2 omd A controversial proposal
AGAINST (I think you meant "unambiguous" there at the end?)
The intent expressed in such a message is necessarily ambiguous, but
required to be unambiguous.
My AGAINST sta
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule
> 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on
> Monday.} with {Agoran weeks begin when Mondays begin.} and replacing
> the text {Agoran m
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:31 PM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby register.
> I declare an intent to sit without objection.
> I submit a proposal with title {fix to 1023/28} and text {Amend Rule
> 1023/28 by replacing the text {Agoran weeks begin at midnight UTC on
> Monday.} with {Agora
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 08:00 +, Computing Comp wrote:
> Sorry for the unsolicited mail
>
> I am Glad to invite you to participate in the upcoming conference,
> IEEE computing Frontier 2012
The ridiculous thing is, that I get spam like this all the time to my
usual account, so this didn't even l
4 matches
Mail list logo
