omd wrote:
>> I support and do so.
>
> You can't; the judgement was made more than seven days ago.
Bah, I misremembered this time limit as being two weeks, same as
calling for appeal. Some of my other recent actions may have been
similarly ineffective, then; will go through and check later. (I
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 16:06, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Proposal: War (AI = 2)
>
> I don't think this addresses the issue with simultaneous point gains, does
> it?
>
It does. Basically if two people at war simultaneously drop each other's
scores
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: War (AI = 2)
I don't think this addresses the issue with simultaneous point gains, does it?
On 26 April 2011 19:00, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I retract the proposal War and submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: War (AI = 2)
>
> Create a new Rule, entitled "War," with the following text:
>
> Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2 tracked by the
> Scorekeepor, with val
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> omd wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 April 2011 04:29, omd wrote:
Oh, fine. Â I judge TRUE.
>>>
>>> I intend to Motion to Reconsider with two support with the argument:
>>> "The fact that G. d
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: War (AI = 2)
> Hostility is a switch for subsets of players of size 2 tracked by the
Missing "create a rule".
On 25 April 2011 22:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 11-04-25 04:06 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
>>
>> Walker 83 167
>
> How?
>
> -scshunt
>
Proposals 7005 through 7010 and 7012, the Registrar office and CFJ 2997.
--
Charles Walker
7 matches
Mail list logo
