omd wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> This point has generated quite a bit of discussion lately, not to
>>> mention that current precedent is that it's false; I think just
>>> stating it as true without any justification is unreasonable.
>>
>> Which precedent? Â Anywa
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> This point has generated quite a bit of discussion lately, not to
>> mention that current precedent is that it's false; I think just
>> stating it as true without any justification is unreasonable.
>
> Which precedent? Anyway, I believe my othe
I'd recommend doing something like a rethink. Have the same general
game structure, but done differently. Things like "currency" and
offices might be fun to change.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
>
> Proto: Initiate an Agoran Decision to repeal each rule in the Ruleset.
omd wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I interpret "gamestate" as including history (at least relevant
>> parts e.g. whether someone deregistered recently, and once that's
>> included, I see no good reason not to include all of it), and
>> ratification as implicitly deem
Proto-Proposal: Rewiring the list
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2282 (Energy) to read:
Ergs are a fixed currency. Ownership of Ergs is restricted to
players.
At the beginning of each month, the following things happen, in
this order:
(a) All ergs and capacitors ar
Proto: Initiate an Agoran Decision to repeal each rule in the Ruleset.
Or something. My point being that we'd get to vote keeping on each rule.
~ Roujo
P.S: I'm kiddding, that would be so much paperwork and the
game could break in SO MANY WAYS! =P
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Elliot
6 matches
Mail list logo
