On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, ais523 wrote:
> I pay a fee to move on the list to Grand Vizier (thus moving coppro out
> of that position).
>
> With Notice, I win the game.
Gratuitous: In this case, winning the game is not an action, but the
result of an action (making a Win Announcement about
2010/10/11 :
> That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of the following string (expect with the
number 3000 incremented), followed by a quotation mark, followed by
the sam
On 11 October 2010 23:12, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> > Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
>> > had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
>> >
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
> > Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
> > had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
> > the game by announcement (via a specific Win An
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
> Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
> had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
> the game by announcement (via a specific Win Announcement: rule 2312),
> and likewise MAY do so.
As a followup,
That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd wrote:
>> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
>> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come ou
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd wrote:
> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted
> to break them apart?
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of th
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 01:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > - A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
> > > > positions P on the li
On 10/11/2010 05:09 AM, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Oh, also, CFJ: {Posting an intent to perform a dependent action is
itself an action.}
This is relevant because of "I intend, with support, to intend, without
objection, to...", presumably?
And, in the
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Oh, also, CFJ: {Posting an intent to perform a dependent action is
> itself an action.}
This is relevant because of "I intend, with support, to intend, without
objection, to...", presumably?
--
ais523
10 matches
Mail list logo
