Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2876 assigned to Wooble

2010-10-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, omd wrote: > But the old version of R101 > might have blocked, say, P5090, which changed the right to invoke > judgement to its current form from: > >iii. Every person has the right to invoke judgement, appeal a > judgement, and to initiate an appeal on a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2876 assigned to Wooble

2010-10-04 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > The original judgement suggests that the pre-"substantial" version of > Rule 101 implicitly blocked both Proposal 5086 (imposing the two-week > limit on appeals, adopted 5F 0A 2P) and Proposal 5769 (which amended > Rule 101 to include "substantial

DIS: Re: BUS: we need more power!

2010-10-04 Thread Elliott Hird
On 4 October 2010 20:28, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I object. I do, however, think Keba bit off a little more than he can chew > and should resign one or more of eir offices. Six hours ago, Keba wrote: > I resign all my offices and go on hold.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2876 assigned to Wooble

2010-10-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Addendum:  what Wooble does in eir argument is replace "substantially" in > > the actual text of R101 with "any".  This is a large difference.  -G. > > I'd say Infinity -> 2 weeks is substantial.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2876 assigned to Wooble

2010-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Addendum:  what Wooble does in eir argument is replace "substantially" in > the actual text of R101 with "any".  This is a large difference.  -G. I'd say Infinity -> 2 weeks is substantial.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I'm totally sorry

2010-10-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 10/04/2010 12:41 PM, omd wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Keba wrote: > > > > I resign all my offices and go on hold. > > > > > > For this, a prop from Wooble to Keba, please. -G. > > > > As requ

DIS: Re: BUS: I'm totally sorry

2010-10-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On 10/04/2010 12:41 PM, omd wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Keba wrote: I resign all my offices and go on hold. For this, a prop from Wooble to Keba, please. -G. As requested, I transfer a prop from Wooble to Keba. --moron in a hurry I bel

DIS: Re: BUS: I'm totally sorry

2010-10-04 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keba wrote: > I resign all my offices and go on hold. > > (What happens with the speaker office now?) I think that since the office of the Speaker is Imposed, you cannot resign it. —Tanner L. Swett

DIS: Re: BUS: I'm totally sorry

2010-10-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keba wrote: > I resign all my offices and go on hold. > > (What happens with the speaker office now?) Nothing; Tiger became Speaker last week.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Letter Of The Rules League Table

2010-10-04 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> No they aren't, the report is "as of the last PSM's report" which >> pre-dated omd's attempts. > > E's still required to publish an up-to-date list of Allegiances, just > not Fan holdings. Well, the message is still correct, it ju