On 01/08/2010 05:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Still covered by EXCUSED, though it's arguable whether the
contestmaster CAN and/or SHALL finish the job in a later week.
I agree wrt the NOT GUILTY by means of impossibility. The FRC's text
requires things be done as soon as possible after the end of e
Yally wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2754
>
> coppro is inactive.
E became active again here:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-January/024935.html
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2754
coppro is inactive.
coppro wrote:
> Also note you're still required to award all the missing points;
> attempting and failing to perform the awards does not discharge the duty.
Still covered by EXCUSED, though it's arguable whether the
contestmaster CAN and/or SHALL finish the job in a later week.
coppro wrote:
> On 01/08/2010 04:57 PM, comex wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:53 PM, ais523 wrote:
>>> Not taken as such, but I object to all of these except the Ienpw and
>>> Warrigal deactivations.
>>
>> I re-intend to make inactivate ehird and G. (if they are here they can
>> object but the
On 01/08/2010 04:57 PM, comex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:53 PM, ais523 wrote:
Not taken as such, but I object to all of these except the Ienpw and
Warrigal deactivations.
I re-intend to make inactivate ehird and G. (if they are here they can
object but the quorum is way too high at the m
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 1) Publish the report in question, including updates through at least
> one week past the last publication of that report. If the
> defendant is no longer Notary, then this task is satisfied by
> publishing text that would constitute
7 matches
Mail list logo
