Following http://theglen.livejournal.com/16735.html of course.
1. I will not change my nickname to nkep.
2. Before I create a new contract, I will ask myself, "Will this end up
causing massive platonic recalculation *again*?"
3. I will not reenact any historical scam that resulted in three or m
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Doesn't matter; the lack just needs to be pointed out.
It needs to be "identified".
On the one hand, if I personally identify a lack of information in the
message (realize that there is a lack of information), but don't
mention it to anyone, it
comex wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> NOTE: Redo with R107 required information and adjusted rate for points.
>
> FYI, you didn't give a list of valid options (but I'm not sending this
> ttpf; not trying to be a jerk)
>
>>
Doesn't ma
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
NOTE: Redo with R107 required information and adjusted rate for
points.
FYI, you didn't give a list of valid options (but I'm not sending this
ttpf; not trying to be a jerk)
2009/8/25 Roger Hicks :
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:29, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I IBA-deposit four 7 crops.
>> I IBA-withdraw two 6 crops, two 5 crops and one 4 crop.
>> I harvest proposals 6450 and 6457 for points.
>>
> I think you may have forgotten that you get diminishing returns on
> IBA
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:29, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I IBA-deposit four 7 crops.
> I IBA-withdraw two 6 crops, two 5 crops and one 4 crop.
> I harvest proposals 6450 and 6457 for points.
>
I think you may have forgotten that you get diminishing returns on
IBA-Deposits after 3. Most of your depos
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 13:03, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> At any other time this would be criminally sloppy, but I promise that
> I will do better. I tried to sort it out myself without relying on the
> janitorial service, but with the last report more than a week ago full
> of CoE's and not ratified
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Why would all parties need to consent to it?
The contract only allows generic act on behalf with the consent of all parties.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:31, Charles
Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Charles
> Walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM,
>>> C-walker wrote:
The LNP intends, with Agoran Consent, to register.
>>>
>>> I suppor
(only the contestmaster CAN make these changes, so this is a
suggestion, not an intent)
Add to the contract, at the end:
7) If this contract is a Champion's Contest, the contestmaster CAN and
SHALL transfer a medal from the contract to any contestant who has won
3 rounds of the Committee since th
10 matches
Mail list logo
