Re: DIS: Ribbon

2009-08-04 Thread yuri_dragon_17
Sean Hunt wrote: yuri_dragon_17 wrote: Sean Hunt wrote: yuri_dragon_17 wrote: Just to make sure I understand all the vocabulary, am I eligible for a White Ribbon? Yes. And I would do this by sending a message to the business list? It's by anno

Re: DIS: Ribbon

2009-08-04 Thread Sean Hunt
yuri_dragon_17 wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> yuri_dragon_17 wrote: >> >>> Just to make sure I understand all the vocabulary, am I eligible for a >>> White Ribbon? >>> >> Yes. >> >> > And I would do this by sending a message to the business list? It's by announcement, yes.

Re: DIS: Ribbon

2009-08-04 Thread yuri_dragon_17
Sean Hunt wrote: yuri_dragon_17 wrote: Just to make sure I understand all the vocabulary, am I eligible for a White Ribbon? Yes. And I would do this by sending a message to the business list?

Re: DIS: Ribbon

2009-08-04 Thread Sean Hunt
yuri_dragon_17 wrote: > Just to make sure I understand all the vocabulary, am I eligible for a > White Ribbon? Yes.

DIS: Ribbon

2009-08-04 Thread yuri_dragon_17
Just to make sure I understand all the vocabulary, am I eligible for a White Ribbon?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Elliott Hird
Much better. But Taral was refering to the gameplay. On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 21:44, Elliott > Hird wrote: >> I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records. >> > Well, as I mentioned that wouldn't be the case since all thos

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 21:44, Elliott Hird wrote: > I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records. > Well, as I mentioned that wouldn't be the case since all those records would be posted to the list on a weekly basis. BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Elliott Hird
I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records. On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:00, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and >>> their effects, even those whi

Re: DIS: Question for BobTHJ

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 20:48, comex wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:46 PM, comex wrote: >> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?player=c. says I have 3 >> Change draws, but >> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?contract=Change does not >> explain how I got them.  Why? > > ...because I

Re: DIS: Question for BobTHJ

2009-08-04 Thread comex
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:46 PM, comex wrote: > http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?player=c. says I have 3 > Change draws, but > http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?contract=Change does not > explain how I got them.  Why? ...because I fail at reading and searched for "change", neglectin

DIS: Question for BobTHJ

2009-08-04 Thread comex
http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?player=c. says I have 3 Change draws, but http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?contract=Change does not explain how I got them. Why? -- -c.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:00, Sean Hunt wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and >> their effects, even those which fail - and can even track the state of >> actions which are under dispute. If you couple this with regular >> reporting of al

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: > Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and > their effects, even those which fail - and can even track the state of > actions which are under dispute. If you couple this with regular > reporting of all those actions to the list I think this safely avoid

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:53, Sean Hunt wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off >> suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think >> it is a bad idea. >> >> BobTHJ > > Actions take place on the lists for a reason.  

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread comex
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off >> suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think >> it is a bad idea. >> >> BobTHJ > > Actions take place on the lists for a reason.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: > Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off > suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think > it is a bad idea. > > BobTHJ Actions take place on the lists for a reason. If actions take place off-list, others have no way of ve

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:17, comex wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: I harvest 2265 for a random land. >>> >>> Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread comex
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >>> I harvest 2265 for a random land. >> >> Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is something that >> might be improved? >> > I've giv

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> I harvest 2265 for a random land. > > Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is something that > might be improved? > I've given some thought to "webifying" the AAA, so that contract-defi

DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ฉันลงทะเบีย น

2009-08-04 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 : > yuri_dragon_17 wrote: >> >> ฉันลงทะเบียน >> > Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register > unambiguously. So, > I register. > > nttpf

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Office Rewards/Penalties Revision

2009-08-04 Thread Sean Hunt
> In R2258, if the following text exists: > {{ > At the beginning of each > week, each holder of a high-priority office who completed a non- > empty set of duties in the prior week earns a number of draws > from the deck indicated by the switch equal to the interest > index

DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ??????????? ?

2009-08-04 Thread comex
2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 : > yuri_dragon_17 wrote: >> >> >> > Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register > unambiguously. So, > I register. NttPF - that is to say, such messages need to be sent to agora-business to be effective. -- -c.

DIS: Re: BUS: ????????????

2009-08-04 Thread yuri_dragon_17
yuri_dragon_17 wrote: Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register unambiguously. So, I register.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enigma] This week's puzzles

2009-08-04 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:45 -0700, Taral wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, ais523 wrote: > > 2 x-points to root; > > 4 x-points to root; > > ??? Well, e submitted solutions. If e can't get the rewards e earnt from them, then that's eir problem. Enigma doesn't care about a contestant's regi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enigma] This week's puzzles

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:45, Taral wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, ais523 wrote: >> 2 x-points to root; >> 4 x-points to root; > > ??? > Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:03 - Enigma awards 6 X-points to root (FAILED - Point ownership is restricted to players) BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: [Enigma] This week's puzzles

2009-08-04 Thread Taral
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, ais523 wrote: > 2 x-points to root; > 4 x-points to root; ??? -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Flag Candidate

2009-08-04 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:34 -0500, Pavitra wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> > Pavitra wrote: > >> >> The vexillum of Agora is defined by the following blazon: > >> >> Pales argent, sable, and argent, charged with a quill sable, an > >> >> open-ended spanner argent, and an axe sable res