On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, ais523 wrote:
> Agreed with this; I've worked with such scams with comex in the past,
> and have also done personal scams (without help) which required months
> of setup. However, I think my favourite gameplay ever was proposal 5707
> and its aftermath;
IIRC, this was similar
2009/8/1 ais523 :
> Heh, it was more complicated than that. The 'subcabal' containing me and
> Sgeo was actually legitimate, in that we were planning genuine scams
> there (some of which we have to try sometime; I don't think any of them
> were actually attempted). We disguised it as a secret cabal
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Heh, it was more complicated than that. The 'subcabal' containing me and
> Sgeo was actually legitimate, in that we were planning genuine scams
> there (some of which we have to try sometime; I don't think any of them
> were actually attempted). We d
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 12:52 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/1 Ed Murphy :
> > comex wrote:
> >> At the extreme, I remember
> >> watching the creation, under a scamming organization called the
> >> "cabal", of a fake "sub-cabal" as a way to trick other players into
> >> participating in a scam b
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 22:58 -0400, comex wrote:
> The amount of planning behind a scam can vary wildly. Even planning
> out a relatively minor scam over IRC can be loads of fun,
> collaborating to check the ruleset for obscure problems and make up
> the exact wording to make it work properly... an
2009/8/1 Ed Murphy :
> comex wrote:
>> At the extreme, I remember
>> watching the creation, under a scamming organization called the
>> "cabal", of a fake "sub-cabal" as a way to trick other players into
>> participating in a scam believing they were participating in a
>> different one.
>
> Which s
6 matches
Mail list logo
