On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Each player has a non-negative integer value Hand Limit (default 15).
> The Hand Limit of each player is tracked by the Registrar. If a
> player's Hand Limit would ever be set below 3, it is instead set to 3.
>
> Owning more cards than your Hand Limit at t
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 13:55, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I withdraw my previous proposal "fix ancient cards".
>> I submit the following proposal, "fix ancient cards", AI-2, II-0.
>> I intend to make it distributable without objection.
>
> Argh, forgot to do t
Announcing Framework Nomic at
http://groups.google.com/group/framework-nomic . The idea is to be a
nomic that is entirely contract based. As much as possible will be
effectively privatized, including the judicial system.
http://groups.google.com/group/framework-nomic/web/base-draft is my
current id
ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 20:47 +0100, C-walker wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ais523 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
No one submitted a guess within the required timeframe.
>>> I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of
Quazie wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2638
>
> Am i certainly active at this point? if i'm not, can i be a judge?
I think you are, but you should re-announce it without pseudocode to
reduce ambiguity.
Quazie wrote:
> I vote present on proposals 6403-6406 if possible.
It isn't, you were inactive when they were distributed. You'll be
able to vote again starting with 6414.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 15:55, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
>> 6419 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Card Lottery
> FOR, but you misspelled Government as Goverment, which may arguably
> break the whole thing.
OopsI think R754 (1) protects this.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 15:48, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> NOV ID Numbers
>> AI: 2
>> II: 1
>> {
>> Append the following to R2230:
>> {{
>> Valid NOVs have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Insulator.
>> }}
>> }
>>
>> BobTHJ
>
> I don't thin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 15:48, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> A new bank-like entity that I've been working on. Attempts to avoid
>> some of the problems that previous banks have faced by not directly
>> owning currency, but instead allowing the market to set rates. I'm
>> solicitin
Roger Hicks wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> NOV ID Numbers
> AI: 2
> II: 1
> {
> Append the following to R2230:
> {{
> Valid NOVs have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Insulator.
> }}
> }
>
> BobTHJ
I don't think NOVs should have ID numbers separate from the CFJs they
become. Unle
Roger Hicks wrote:
> A new bank-like entity that I've been working on. Attempts to avoid
> some of the problems that previous banks have faced by not directly
> owning currency, but instead allowing the market to set rates. I'm
> soliciting comments, and will likely have the automation in place to
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
>>> Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
>>
>> Those sort of things don't work as well when there's conditional voting.
>>
>
> And when you can vo
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
>> Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
>
> Those sort of things don't work as well when there's conditional voting.
>
And when you can vote for, then change that vote to against.
--
C
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> 6420 O 0 1.0 G. no, really!
A note on this: beyond the obvious "let me win" thing. We did this because
of the new speaker succession rules:
1. If 2+ people win before coppro wins, e rotates off the Speaker list.
2. If coppro wins,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, wrote:
> Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins.
Those sort of things don't work as well when there's conditional voting.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 13:14 +0100, C-walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM,
>> C-walker wrote:
>> > I intend, without party objection, to terminate "the Pledge which has
>> > no name". (The one regarding name changes).
>>
>> Having receiv
16 matches
Mail list logo
