On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, C-walker wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear<geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, <kenner...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Every player who voted FOR on this Proposal wins. >> >> Those sort of things don't work as well when there's conditional voting. >> > > And when you can vote for, then change that vote to against.
A more interesting version would be something like: "The players responsible for the first N unchanged, unconditional FOR votes, where N is the minimal number required to pass given the total votes, win." We also once did: "Anyone holding an X card at the end of the voting period wins. (where X was some card type that was uncommon but not rare; e.g. in perhaps a third of the players' hands)." that led to some interesting card trades and plays. -G.
