On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On Sunday, July 26, 2009, Kenner Gordon wrote:
>> Do the rules explicitly say a-d has no effect?
>
>> No. They also don't say you can't act by yelling at an elephant.
More usefully, when something is invented by the rules (like, winning
a point, transfe
No. They also don't say you can't act by yelling at an elephant.
On Sunday, July 26, 2009, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> Do the rules explicitly say a-d has no effect?
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:55 -0600, Kenner Gordon wrote:
>>> Thank you - the websit
Do the rules explicitly say a-d has no effect?
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:55 -0600, Kenner Gordon wrote:
>> Thank you - the website doesn't say which is for which.
>
> The convention is to post to a-o if it's an officer duty mandated by a
> rule, or t
A new bank-like entity that I've been working on. Attempts to avoid
some of the problems that previous banks have faced by not directly
owning currency, but instead allowing the market to set rates. I'm
soliciting comments, and will likely have the automation in place to
make this work within the n
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:30, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:43 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> rough proto to solicit comments:
>>
>> Deck of Business
>>
>> Create a fourth basic deck with the Notary as Dealor focused around
>> contests and contracts. This deck may include some basic cards
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
> Yes, but I've been trying to get rid of The Cookie Jar for ages, and now
> looked like a good chance. The issue with The Cookie Jar is, that if
> there's precisely 1 person paying attention, they get loads of points
> out of it...
With points now tradeable, th
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:52 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 20:47 +0100, C-walker wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> >> No one submitted a guess within the required timeframe.
>> >
>> > I intend, without 3
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 20:47 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> No one submitted a guess within the required timeframe.
> >
> > I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of The Cookie
>
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:55 -0600, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> Thank you - the website doesn't say which is for which.
The convention is to post to a-o if it's an officer duty mandated by a
rule, or to a-b for other actions. (With the occasional exception,
things posted to a-d have no effect; the thing
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 06:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > G. wrote:
> >> None were particularly compelling. Like Notes, the overhead of choosing
> >> one's location etc. was just More Trouble Than It Was Worth. It's not
> >> that your proto is bad, it's jus
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:43 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> rough proto to solicit comments:
>
> Deck of Business
>
> Create a fourth basic deck with the Notary as Dealor focused around
> contests and contracts. This deck may include some basic cards (such
> as massaging contest Threshold limits, cre
> I do not agree to the below contract at this time:
What contract? :)
12 matches
Mail list logo
