C-walker wrote:
> The idea of this proto is to introduce a "Hard Mode" Renaissance, with
> Medals instead of Ribbons and a Win by "Industrial Revolution" for
> collecting them all.
>
> Here are some proto medals:
>
> * Judge II 3 Case.
> * Judge II 3 Criminal Case.
These should require that the
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> Nothing that encourages people to amend R104, please. Also, 'Medal' is
> already taken as an asset name, although we could have some interesting
> wins if you used that anyway.
R104 amendment was mostly a joke.
Suggestions for a different name?
--
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 20:18 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> The idea of this proto is to introduce a "Hard Mode" Renaissance, with
> Medals instead of Ribbons and a Win by "Industrial Revolution" for
> collecting them all.
>
> Here are some proto medals:
>
> * II 3 Proposal adopted unanimously
> * AI 3
The idea of this proto is to introduce a "Hard Mode" Renaissance, with
Medals instead of Ribbons and a Win by "Industrial Revolution" for
collecting them all.
Here are some proto medals:
* II 3 Proposal adopted unanimously
* AI 3 proposal adopted unanimously
* Judge II 3 Case.
* Judge II 3 Crimi
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 11, 2009, at 6:48 AM, C-walker
wrote:
Again, apologies for the lack of wrapping,
http://agora.qoid.us/aword.cgi still appears to be out of action.
Oops, fixed.
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:41 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 03:56 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> >> I hereby request any and all persons to submit evidence and arguments,
> >> either publicly or by private email to me, that may be relevant to this
> >> case.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Either way, my rank could not have become 1. I
> recommend REMAND so that the judge may fix the errors in eir argument.
He said "if".
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:13 AM,
C-walker wrote:
> Whoops, I forgot to appeal this. If I still can, I intend, with 2
> support, to appeal. I (and around two others, IIRC) submitted
> suggested settlements in our arguments: these all seem to have been
> ignored.
No, they submitted *ideas* for settl
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Any thoughts on how we should proceed? We could convert this to a
> Card exchange, let an equity judge sort out an equitable way to deal
> with notes disappearing, or just terminate it altogether (which would
> probably be unfair to ais523 e
9 matches
Mail list logo
