On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> Proposal: Creative Offices (AI = 2, II = 1)
>
> I transfer a prop from Yally, for this quoted-printable abortion of a
> proposal, to YMCMBFE, for eir tireless opposition to obnoxi
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> It's easy to see an endless parade of elections for popular-to-hold offices.
>> I submit the following proposal, Terms, AI-2:
>
> I withdraw the proposal indicated above and submit the following
> proposal, Terms and vacancies, AI-2.
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/6/12 Kerim Aydin :
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Contradicts Phill precedent.
>>
>> How? The signature clearly claimed emself to be ais523, not another
>> person.
>
> "Phill, who has never been a player before [etc]" was judged
2009/6/12 Kerim Aydin :
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Contradicts Phill precedent.
>
> How? The signature clearly claimed emself to be ais523, not another
> person.
"Phill, who has never been a player before [etc]" was judged as a
claim of identity.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:14 PM, comex wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Any player CAN, by announcement, initiate an election for a
>>> specified elected office for which no election has been
>>> initiate
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Contradicts Phill precedent.
How? The signature clearly claimed emself to be ais523, not another
person.
E then said e might have been the Herald. That doesn't mean e
claimed to be the person that happened to hold the office, that means
e claimed tha
Contradicts Phill precedent.
On 2009-06-12, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2544
>>
>> === CFJ 2544 (Interest Index = 2)
>>
>>The signature in the above quote is a
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> Proposal: Creative Offices (AI = 2, II = 1)
>
> I transfer a prop from Yally, for this quoted-printable abortion of a
> proposal, to YMCMBFE, for eir tireless opposition to obnoxious message
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Charles
Walker wrote:
> I retract (of if that fails remove from the proposal pool) the above
> discussed proposal, and submit a new identical one, except with all
> instances of "Porter" replaced with "Greetor".
I'm treating this as ineffective in submitting a new p
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Rodlen wrote:
> I CFJ on the following:
> "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Power
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Ah; to me, the Town Fountain is a power-4 reference for insisting that
> 'Marvy' must be a noun. CFJing on "'Marvy' is a noun" would probably be
> IRRELEVANT, though, so I won't gum the judicial system up with that CFJ.
>
But its text is clea
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Rodlen wrote:
> >>
> >>> I CFJ on the following:
> >>> "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?"
> >>
> >> Ineffective, neither
Yally wrote:
> I also judge REASSIGN.
You can't, but this also counts as opining, which you can do.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> ps. Maybe not the best reference (i.e. a good dictionary would give dialect
> origin, maybe the source does) but: http://www.yourdictionary.com/marvy.
marvy, adj.
slang (chiefly U.S.).
= MARVELLOUS adj. 2.
1932 G. LORIMER & S. LORIMER Men
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/12 Warrigal :
>> --Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal
>>
> Why don't you?
>
Where's the fun in that?
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Rodlen wrote:
>>
>>> I CFJ on the following:
>>> "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?"
>>
>> Ineffective, neither a statement nor a yes/no question.
>
> Shouldn't it be judged MALFORM
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Shouldn't it be judged MALFORMED, then? Or can the CotC catch those
> before they're assigned?
You only CAN initiate an inquiry CFJ if you include a statement.
Arguably it should be impossible for MALFORMED to be an appropriate
judgment.
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Rodlen wrote:
>
> > I CFJ on the following:
> > "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?"
>
> Ineffective, neither a statement nor a yes/no question.
Shouldn't it be judged MALFORMED, then? Or can the CotC catch those
before th
2009/6/12 Warrigal :
> --Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal
>
Why don't you?
--
-Tiger
19 matches
Mail list logo
