On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> Rodlen wrote: > >> > >>> I CFJ on the following: > >>> "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?" > >> > >> Ineffective, neither a statement nor a yes/no question. > > > > Shouldn't it be judged MALFORMED, then? Or can the CotC catch those > > before they're assigned? > > > > Anyway, judicial precedent is that only Marvies (or possibly, 'ye > > Marvy') is forced to do the dancing, and that Marvy has no rules-defined > > or common-language definition. > > Neither does AGAINT. > > Among others, Maud is Marvy. "Marvies" is indeed a grammatical anathema. > > -G. > > ps. Maybe not the best reference (i.e. a good dictionary would give dialect > origin, maybe the source does) but: http://www.yourdictionary.com/marvy.
Ah; to me, the Town Fountain is a power-4 reference for insisting that 'Marvy' must be a noun. CFJing on "'Marvy' is a noun" would probably be IRRELEVANT, though, so I won't gum the judicial system up with that CFJ. -- ais523
