Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

Michael Norrish wrote: > PS: would people be interested in a Zendo contest/sub-game? (See > http://www.koryheath.com/games/zendo/design-history, for example.) Sounds neat. Turn-based games (e.g., nomic) tend to be made less so when played by email. Does anyone see any outstanding gameplay issues

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Time travel

Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Any action performed by sending a message is performed at >> the time specified in the message, if any, or at the time >> date-stamped on that message otherwise. >> } >> >> [This would allow, e.g., "I register ye

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote: Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the subtleties of the Agoran way. Clever. I'm kinda glad I never had to both

DIS: Re: BUS: Time travel

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Any action performed by sending a message is performed at > the time specified in the message, if any, or at the time > date-stamped on that message otherwise. > } > > [This would allow, e.g., "I register yesterday at 17:49 UTC." I b

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

Elliott Hird wrote: > What- how? > > On 2009-06-01, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I can win by announcement, though that's not considered a bug (it's also >> highly illegal, but if I really wanted to I could). I can flip caste by announcement.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Heald] Hear Ye, Hear Ye

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Be it HEREBY KNOWN that as the Herald, I award the title Champion (by >> Proposal) and Minister Without Portfolio to the entity whose escutcheon > > MWoP is only to be awarded to Players. > > CFJ: {Canada bears the Patent Title Minister

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

Disregard. On 2009-06-01, Elliott Hird wrote: > Please stop using HTML mail. Your chosen font is hard to read. > > On 2009-06-01, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> IADoP's Office Report >> >> Date of last report: Tue, 26 May 09 >> Date of this report: Mon, 01 Jun 09 >> (All times are UTC) >> >> Recent El

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

He has bouts of existance, it's not too rare :-) On 2009-06-01, Sean Hunt wrote: > Michael Norrish wrote: >> Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: >>> I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling >>> to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the >>> subtleties of th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

What- how? On 2009-06-01, Sean Hunt wrote: > Quazie wrote: >> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Benjamin Caplan >> wrote: >>> Quazie wrote: Append the text of R 2244 to R104 Repeal rule R2244 >>> You've been around long enough to know better than to amend R104. Also, >>> both of th

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

Please stop using HTML mail. Your chosen font is hard to read. On 2009-06-01, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > IADoP's Office Report > > Date of last report: Tue, 26 May 09 > Date of this report: Mon, 01 Jun 09 > (All times are UTC) > > Recent Election History > --- > Sun, 24 May 21:25

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote: > Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: >> I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling >> to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the >> subtleties of the Agoran way. Clever. > > I'm kinda glad I never had to bother with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Quazie wrote: > I do know better. It was still a valid janitorial event. Also, I > could submit the same proposal every week and it wouldn't be illegal > (i would likely get de-janitorized though) maybe thats a bug of > janitor? Not a legislatively-fixable one; if we change

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Periodic Election (CotC)

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Yally wrote: > > > I intend, with support, to initiate an election for Clerk of the Courts. > > Any particular reason? > > None other than CotC has gone the longest without an election.

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Periodic Election (CotC)

Yally wrote: > I intend, with support, to initiate an election for Clerk of the Courts. Any particular reason?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

Quazie wrote: > I do know better. It was still a valid janitorial event. Also, I > could submit the same proposal every week and it wouldn't be illegal > (i would likely get de-janitorized though) maybe thats a bug of > janitor? Not much of one; a whole lot of unwritten guidelines are effective

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Monthly stuff

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > > > Sean Hunt wrote: > >> I award myself a Yellow Ribbon. > > I performed duties related to 3-Scroll Rodney in a timely manner during > May. > > I performed duties related to Cookie Jar and the Fantasy Rules > Contest in a timely

DIS: Re: BUS: Monthly stuff

coppro wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> I award myself a Yellow Ribbon. > I performed duties related to 3-Scroll Rodney in a timely manner during May. I performed duties related to Cookie Jar and the Fantasy Rules Contest in a timely manner during May. (Disclaimer: I might have missed a deadline so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

Michael Norrish wrote: > Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: >> I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling >> to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the >> subtleties of the Agoran way. Clever. > > I'm kinda glad I never had to bother with it :-) > > Michael.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the subtleties of the Agoran way. Clever. I'm kinda glad I never had to bother with it :-) Michael.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

Quazie wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Benjamin Caplan > wrote: >> Quazie wrote: >>> Append the text of R 2244 to R104 >>> >>> Repeal rule R2244 >> You've been around long enough to know better than to amend R104. Also, >> both of these sentences should have periods at the end. >> > > I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Quazie wrote: >> Append the text of R 2244 to R104 >> >> Repeal rule R2244 > You've been around long enough to know better than to amend R104. Also, > both of these sentences should have periods at the end. > I do know better. It was stil

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deputisation

Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On May 30, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> Alex Smith wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 11:51 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I intend to deputize for the Speaker to assign Prerogatives for the month of June. >>> >>> So do I. Who is the Speaker, anyway? >>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Deputisation

On May 30, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Alex Smith wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 11:51 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I intend to deputize for the Speaker to assign Prerogatives for the month of June. So do I. Who is the Speaker, anyway? OscarMeyr. And I'll intend to deputize for the S

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: intent to deputise

Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> Geoffrey Spear wrote: >>> I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became >>> Speaker on 20 May 2009. >> Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the >> > > > Respectfully, my

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: intent to deputise

On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Geoffrey Spear wrote: I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became Speaker on 20 May 2009. Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the Respectfully, my nickname is OscarMeyr, not Oscar. Take a go

Re: DIS: Proto: Constitutional Anarchy

Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> Benjamin Caplan wrote: >>> Sean Hunt wrote: The rights and freedoms granted by this rule do not create allow any actions to be taken, even if those actions would be necessary >>> "create allow" is surely a mistake. Perhaps "create t

Re: DIS: Proto: Constitutional Anarchy

Sean Hunt wrote: > Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Sean Hunt wrote: >>> The rights and freedoms granted by this rule do not create allow >>> any actions to be taken, even if those actions would be necessary >> "create allow" is surely a mistake. Perhaps "create the possibility >> for"? Or did

Re: DIS: Proto: Constitutional Anarchy

Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: >> I submit the following proto-proposal, entitled {Constitutional >> Anarchy}. Its adoption index is 3, its interest index is 3. > What's the ultimate goal of all this? > >> The rights and freedoms granted by this rule do not create allow >> a

Re: DIS: Proto: Constitutional Anarchy

Sean Hunt wrote: > I submit the following proto-proposal, entitled {Constitutional > Anarchy}. Its adoption index is 3, its interest index is 3. What's the ultimate goal of all this? > The rights and freedoms granted by this rule do not create allow > any actions to be taken, even if t

DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

Quazie wrote: > Append the text of R 2244 to R104 > > Repeal rule R2244 You've been around long enough to know better than to amend R104. Also, both of these sentences should have periods at the end. > The following are Agoran Holiday's as defined by R1769: No apostrophe. > (a) Winter Break - > T

DIS: Re: BUS: Janitor's Report

2009/5/31 Quazie : > First Game Clean-up > AI=3, II=0 > (( > Append the text of R 2244 to R104 AGAINST; modifies R104

DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Canadian Anarchy

2009/5/31 Jonatan Kilhamn : > The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties. > > Canadian Anarchy > AI=2, II=0 > (( > Repeal Rule 2249 (Maple Leaf Dominance) > )) > > This message was sent Sun 31 May > These duties were last fulfilled Tue 19 May > -- > -Tiger > NO

DIS: Proto: Constitutional Anarchy

I submit the following proto-proposal, entitled {Constitutional Anarchy}. Its adoption index is 3, its interest index is 3. {{{ When interpreting the text of this proposal, it is treated as if text contained within square brackets did not exist; they are merely annotations for the convenience of A

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Proto-proto: If an entity is required to destroy a Rest in the >> possession of a player with no Rests, it CAN by announcement create a >> Note of a specified pitch and a Rest in the possession of that player. > > Or just allow negative rests. > We'v

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > >> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt wrote: > >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I appeal this judgment. > >>> Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

ais523 wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. >>> Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3 >>> Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if t

Re: DIS: recently unalienated, perhaps misunderstanding rules...

zeckalpha wrote: > Rule 2150/6 seems contradictory > Personhood > > A person is an entity defined as such by rules with power of at > least 2. A person CAN generally be the subject of rights and > obligations under the rules. > > Any biological organism that is generally cap

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2534 judged TRUE by Rodlen

Rodlen wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Ed Murphy > wrote: > > ehird wrote: > > >>> I intend to appeal this as Rodlen clearly has not considered private > >>> agreements taking effect as is the precedent. He seems to think this > >>> CFJ a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2541-42 assigned to Rodlen

coppro wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Rodlen wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Rodlen wrote: I judge CFJ 2541 FALSE and CFJ 2542 TRUE. Â In the first case, Quazie attempted to announce that the rule repealed itself without causing it to

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2524a assigned to G., Rodlen, ehird

Rodlen wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Elliott Hird > > wrote: > > 2009/5/29 Ed Murphy >: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2524a > > Trivial OVERRULE/{}. > > > OVERRU

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

On Sun, 31 May 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: > I assumed... Hazing of sorts. Makes sense to weed out those unwilling > to put up with criticism and informs initiates about some of the > subtleties of the Agoran way. Clever. Maybe this should be in the FAQ? The ironic thing is, the reason R869 i