On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> You can only contest a CoE by calling a CFJ on the matter, specifying
> which report you're contesting and specifically stating you're
> contesting it. You didn't provide the text of the CFJ, so that fails.
O.o I mixed up CoE and NoV.
--
Tara
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 18:54 -0700, Taral wrote:
> I contest these CoEs.
You can only contest a CoE by calling a CFJ on the matter, specifying
which report you're contesting and specifically stating you're
contesting it. You didn't provide the text of the CFJ, so that fails.
--
ais523
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Thus, even if Goethe succeeded in multiple
>> caste flips (which I don't believe e did, but that's a matter for the
>> appeal in the revelant CFJ), coppro would not be responsible for
>> fixing them through other caste flips.
>
> I tried to hav
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro's caste flips on or about Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:08:13 -0600
>> were illegal.
>
> I judge TRUE. I accept caller's argument that the holder of the Grand
> Poobah office is only obligated, and
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Taral wrote:
> I contest these CoEs.
You can't, but the CoEs don't have any legal force as a distribution
of proposals is not self-ratifying.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> As I have just taken office, all the data listed may not be correct. Please
> inform me if there are any missing or incorrect details in this report.
You're missing my recent going on (Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:57:37) and
coming off (Wed, 1 Apr 2
6 matches
Mail list logo
