Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
> White can be acquired by mentoring a new player, which can theoretically
> happen more than once.
Oh. The wording is pretty ambiguous; I read it as the new player getting
the Ribbon, and since they can only name one mentor, they can only
acquire it the second tim
coppro wrote:
> As it stands, Win by Renaissance is kind of broken. Of the twelve types
> of Ribbons currently in existence, White can only be acquired twice (and
> then only if you have been playing continuously since you started),
> Magenta can only be acquired once a year, and Ultraviolet can b
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:06 PM, comex wrote:
> Hello! This may be incorrect, and I'll check it over again when I get
> the chance but this is a preliminary report of what I think Note
> holdings are at present.
I spent 3 notes to increase the PNP's caste a day or two ago, I think.
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:26 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > "4x4":
> >
> > ...
> >
> > "Bits and Bytes":
> >
> > ...
>
> Crap, sorry, I forgot to change the To: address.
Note that you have to submit answers privately. Submission to a-d
doesn't coun
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> "4x4":
>
> ...
>
> "Bits and Bytes":
>
> ...
Crap, sorry, I forgot to change the To: address.
"4x4":
Take the four non-corner coins and stack each one on top of a
different corner coin, leaving four stacks of two coins arranged in a
square, with each of the sides having four coins in it.
"Bits and Bytes":
1001101010111100110111101000100010011000101
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 22:27 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I create and agree to a contract with the following text:
Sort-of works, but as a non-pledge contract (and non-public, for that
matter), it doesn't become binding until at least one other person
agrees to it (and therefore doesn't define assets,
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 21:16 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I join the Vote Market.
It was terminated by proposal. I'm therefore treating this as not
sufficiently clear to agree to a new copy of the contract.
--
ais523
Notary
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:02 +, Charles Walker wrote:
> I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted at
> http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set
> of
> forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the
> forums
> allow for ano
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
>>
>> AVPR GEL, OHG V GNXR GUR SBYYBJVAT NPGVBA:
> (rot13: "Nice try, but I take the following action:")
>> J DBMM GPS KVEHFNFOU PO UIF GPMMPXJOH TUBUFNFOU:
>
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 11:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>
> > 6155 FOR
>
> Ineffective due to caste.
>
Actually, given the PNP's standard voting header, it was specifically
purporting to vote 0 times. So ineffective due to being a no-op.
--
ais523
comex wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
>> You'd probably assert that any given esolang is also ridiculously well
>> known. I, for one, can't recognize a bunch of ran
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:02 AM, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> AVPR GEL, OHG V GNXR GUR SBYYBJVAT NPGVBA:
>> J DBMM GPS KVEHFNFOU PO UIF GPMMPXJOH TUBUFNFOU:
>> JXYI YI JXU IJQJUCUDJ ED MXYSX Y SQBBUT VEH ZKTWUCUDJ XUHU.
>
> NICE TRY, BUT I TAKE THE FOLLO
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> AVPR GEL, OHG V GNXR GUR SBYYBJVAT NPGVBA:
> J DBMM GPS KVEHFNFOU PO UIF GPMMPXJOH TUBUFNFOU:
> JXYI YI JXU IJQJUCUDJ ED MXYSX Y SQBBUT VEH ZKTWUCUDJ XUHU.
NICE TRY, BUT I TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTION:
I CALL FOR JUDGEMENT ON THE FOLLOWING STATE
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
>
> You'd probably assert that any given esolang is also ridiculously well
> known. I, for one, can't recognize a bunch of random hex digits as
>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
You'd probably assert that any given esolang is also ridiculously well
known. I, for one, can't recognize a bunch of random hex digits as
having a meaning in base64. I assumed you were trying to take an
a
16 matches
Mail list logo
