On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> !ENFORCED CHARITY. I was two blots in three days. [Cards]
I had Oligardiness (a historical class 2 infraction committed by
failing to take a particular action within three days).
> !FEBRUARY. I am the lunation of li
On 11/11/2008, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == Equity Case 2241 ==
>
> due to comex's actions with respect to the PBA, it is now very
> difficult to determine the number of AAA-defined assets comex
> and the PBA hold
On 11/11/2008, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As trial judge of CFJ 2218, I order the parties to the Russian
> Roulette contract to provide me with a plaintext copy of the contents
> of the file specified in the CFJ statement.
>
> Also, H. Notary ais523, would you please forward me a
ais523 wrote:
>> NooPolis(unknown)
> Unfortunately, I don't know this one.
Looks like one or more of
http://mindbroker.de/wiki/DiscussionForum
http://mindbroker.de/wiki/DiskussionsForum
http://mindbroker.de/wiki/AskMindBroker
(Is there a German speaker in the house?)
== Equity Case 2241 ==
due to comex's actions with respect to the PBA, it is now very
difficult to determine the number of AAA-defined assets comex
and the PBA hold without unreasonable effort on the part of
multiple recordkeepors.
Pavitra wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2008 04:33:05 am Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Pavitra wrote:
>>> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per
>>> week (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so
>>> far (except mine) is AGAINST.
>> How about twice per week, evenl
On Monday 10 November 2008 04:33:05 am Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
> > I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per
> > week (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so
> > far (except mine) is AGAINST.
>
> How about twice per week, evenly spaced, as durin
ehird wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2008, at 16:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> In all my future communications, a vote of SDONATE(x - y) should be
>> evaluated to be the posting of Sell Ticket with cost x and casting all
>> my valid votes endorsing the filler. If the ticket is not filled, the
>> vote should be
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
> 0 ##
> 1 #-#
> 2 #--#
> 3 #---#
> 4 ##
> 5 #-#
> 6 #--#
> 7 #---#
> 8##
> 9 #-#
> 10
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:03:51 +
Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:58 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > [Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate
> > >
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> iSit
>
> ihope
Hopeful is not a posture.
--Warrigal
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> iSit
ihope
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:42, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I award a Lobbyist to every first-class person. Without three
> objections, I intend to amend the Political Action Committee by
> appending "The Chairman SHALL NOT award Lobbyists selfishly." to item
> 2.
I believe your attempted
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:58 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > [Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate
> > but not interested].
> >
> > I resign from each and every public contract of which (a
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 19:32, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> [Don't want to be bound by contests broken when equity dies Unfortunate
> but not interested].
>
> I resign from each and every public contract of which (a) I am a member
> and (b) the contract allows me to exit at this tim
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 14:18, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2221
>
> == CFJ 2221 ==
>
>Wooble caused the Reformed Bank of Agora to transfer 3 crops to
>em a moment ag
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 06:05 -0800, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
> PerlNomic (unknown)
It should tell itself...
> Normish (unknown)
irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/#rootnomic seems to be the usual place.
> NooPolis(unknown)
Unfortunately, I don't know this one.
--
ais523
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:42, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I award a Lobbyist to every first-class person. Without three
> objections, I intend to amend the Political Action Committee by
> appending "The Chairman SHALL NOT award Lobbyists selfishly." to item
> 2.
>
How about "Lobbyists CA
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, I'd seen the proposal. Pavitra's PerlNomic proposal is 7 days
> between; I'm not sure if this was deliberate or accidental. (PerlNomic
> currently has no concept of weeks as such, only time intervals.)
Oh, my. No wonder
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:05 -0800, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
> >> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week
> >> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the on
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
>> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week
>> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far
>> (except mine) is AGAINST.
> The
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (for still not getting this sorted by number)
Fixed. Bayes should vote in order in the next distribution.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2008, at 16:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> In all my future communications, a vote of SDONATE(x - y) should be
>> evaluated to be the posting of Sell Ticket with cost x and casting all
>> my valid votes endorsing the f
On 10 Nov 2008, at 17:20, Ed Murphy wrote:
ehird, if comex promised to fix this and I've forgotten about it,
please point it out; in this situation, I recommend that Wooble
transfer a prop from em to you in compensation.
Welp, I'm pretty sure I've asked comex to do it. I haven't committed
t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In all my future communications, a vote of SDONATE(x - y) should be
> evaluated to be the posting of Sell Ticket with cost x and casting all
> my valid votes endorsing the filler. If the ticket is not filled, the
> vote shou
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:44 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The AFO and I agree to the following: { ais523 CAN act on behalf of the
> > vote collector for Proposal 5707 to resolve that decision. Murphy CAN
> > terminate this contract
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:04, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2008, at 16:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> In all my future communications, a vote of SDONATE(x - y) should be
>> evaluated to be the posting of Sell Ticket with cost x and casting all
>> my valid votes endorsing the fi
On 10 Nov 2008, at 16:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
In all my future communications, a vote of SDONATE(x - y) should be
evaluated to be the posting of Sell Ticket with cost x and casting all
my valid votes endorsing the filler. If the ticket is not filled, the
vote should be evaluated as a DONATE(y) vo
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote:
> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week
> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far
> (except mine) is AGAINST.
The problem with limiting it to at least 7 days between proposals is
that almost
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5958 O 1 1.0 WarrigalAgoran History
> AGAINST * 5
Anything I can do to convince you otherwise?
--Warrigal
On 10 Nov 2008, at 08:16, Taral wrote:
The frequent distributions are really becoming a nuisance.
Sorry... but there were _sixteen_ proposals.
--
ehird
On 10 Nov 2008, at 08:07, Ed Murphy wrote:
Suggest also re-titling "The Monster" to "Monster Facts".
Suggest repealing the monster because we passed a proposal to give it
to B.
--
ehird
On 10 Nov 2008, at 04:53, Warrigal wrote:
Posted with what was probably permission.
Proto: Only senators can propose in an emergency.
--
ehird
Pavitra wrote:
> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week
> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far
> (except mine) is AGAINST.
How about twice per week, evenly spaced, as during Zefram's tenure?
Dvorak Herring wrote:
> Seeing as most if not all of these proposals will pass, I vote:
>
> Proposal 5841: AGAINST
Ineffective, you already voted AGAINST.
> Proposals 5842-5941: FOR
Ineffective, you already voted AGAINST (except 5859 where you already
voted FOR).
Dvorak Herring wrote:
>> 5859 D 3 1.0 P23 Points for Me
> AGAINST
Ineffective, you already voted FOR.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:49 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following Proposal, titled "random fixes part 1":
>
> Amend Rule 101 by removing:
AI?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
comex wrote:
> Amend Rule 2192 by adding after:
> The Mad Scientist is an office; its holder is responsible for
> building the Monster. The Mad Scientist CAN act on behalf of
> the Monster to take any action that the Monster may take, and
> SHALL act on behalf of the Monst
comex wrote:
> Amend Rule 101 by removing:
> WHEREAS Agora, since its inception, has functioned not only as a
> game but as a society, and WHEREAS a society, to function, must
> balance its Rules with the natural rights of its participants,
Object.
> Amend Rule 1681 by replacin
39 matches
Mail list logo
