comex wrote: > Amend Rule 101 by removing: > WHEREAS Agora, since its inception, has functioned not only as a > game but as a society, and WHEREAS a society, to function, must > balance its Rules with the natural rights of its participants,
Object. > Amend Rule 1681 by replacing: > Whenever a rule is changed in any way, the Rulekeepor shall > record a historical annotation to the rule indicating: > with: > Whenever a rule is modified in any way (including a power or > title change), the Rulekeepor CAN cause it to amend itself by > adding a historical annotation, which MUST include: Non-intuitive, revise and I might support. > Amend Rule 1789 by replacing: > Whenever a Player > with: > Whenever a first-class Player Object. > Amend Rule 2152 by removing: > If a rule specifies one or more persons in connection with a > term, then the term applies only to the specified person(s). > [too strict and literal interpretation could lead to all sorts of confusion] Why's it too strict? This prevents e.g. "inactive players CANNOT X" from applying R2152(1)'s "Attempts to perform the described action are unsuccessful" to all persons. > Change the power of Rule 2146 to 1. Object. This would allow reversing the threshold for adopting proposals by redefining indices as being ordered oppositely from standard math.
