On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One of the main ways equity works is by allowing direct holdings adjustments
>> of contract-governed assets. Equity is only power 1.7. -Goethe
>
> What in R2169 authorizes that? Th
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 17:17, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:02 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In case you're not bored yet, I terminate the Agoran Loan Service and
>>> agree to th
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
>> AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
> In that case I retract my votes and vote FOR.
You voted FOR the first time, so this is effectively a no-op.
comex wrote:
>> 5830 D 1 3.0 Murphy Spread democracy
> FOR, although it sort of punishes involvement. For example, I
> wouldn't want to leave either the AFO or Bayes.
Partnerships wouldn't lose votes for having players as parties,
but for lacking sufficient non-players as parties.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 17:17, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:02 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In case you're not bored yet, I terminate the Agoran Loan Service and
>> agree to the following:
> I join this contract. I give 5 coins to ihope.
>
Since it's r
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
>>> AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
>
> One of t
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
>> AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
One of the main ways equity works is by allowing direct holdings adjustments
of contract-
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 16:53, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 22:45, warrigal wrote:
>
> I deposit as many VP as possible for at least 15 coins each.
>
> 9
I concur.
BobTHJ
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 30 Oct 2008, at 00:04, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
3 x AGAINST, though I might support adding the sea monster by itself
It's the cookie monster, silly.
* leans way back
Oh! NOW I see it.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On 30 Oct 2008, at 00:04, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
3 x AGAINST, though I might support adding the sea monster by itself
It's the cookie monster, silly.
--
ehird
ehird wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 12:44, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I don't want to dump that into R2193 itself. Re-propose adding the
>> relevant bit somewhere in R2105 and I'll support.
>
> Um, it's my Monster proposal. I'm Mad Scientist now.
I know.
ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> For CotC, the valid options are ehird and Murphy.
> I vote SELL(3VP - ehird).
H. IADoP Wooble, can we get a tally of the votes so far?
On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 22:13, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I mill 0 - 9 = 2 using Land #48.
I mill 8 / 4 = 2 using Land #68.
And in case I need it: I mill 4 / 8 = 6 using Land #68.
This last milling fails (you already used y
On 29 Oct 2008, at 22:45, warrigal wrote:
I deposit as many VP as possible for at least 15 coins each.
9
--
ehird
On 29 Oct 2008, at 22:45, warrigal wrote:
I deposit as many VP as possible for at least 15 coins each.
= nine
--
ehird
On 29 Oct 2008, at 22:45, warrigal wrote:
I deposit as many VP as possible for at least 15 coins each.
Go daamn i.
BobTHJ? How many VP does warrigal have?
--
ehird
On 29 Oct 2008, at 20:48, Roger Hicks wrote:
ehird, you missed this
Thanks.
--
ehird
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
> AGAINST. It breaks Equity.
How so?
-root
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:43, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I PBA-withdraw as many 1 crops as I can (I think nine for ^117).
>
ehird, you missed this
BobTHJ
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:26 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:27, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to send the following on behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ
> > 2203a, with the support of two of {woggle, Goethe, the CotC}:
> > {{{
> > This panel REMANDs C
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 17:35 +, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I intend to cause the panel of 2203a to send the following message,
> > with the support of two of {woggle, ais523, the CotC}:
> >
> > As mentioned in the Appellant's arguments, there is sufficient evidence
> > in the discussion forum aroun
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 06:17 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The Notary's records still list Levi as party to the AFO. I'm pretty
> sure we removed em a while back (e was no longer a player, and evidently
> no longer following the game).
Ah yes, e was removed by proposal 5576. (That took me quite a while
On 29 Oct 2008, at 18:08, Alex Smith wrote:
I PBA-deposit a 9 crop [gaining ^19].
I PBA-withdraw a 0 crop [paying ^9].
I PBA-deposit two 6 crops [gaining ^28+^27=^55].
I PBA-withdraw four 7 crops [paying ^11+^12+^13+^14=^50].
I PBA-withdraw two 4 crops [paying ^6+^7=^13].
works
--
ehird
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 23:33 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2008, at 23:31, comex wrote:
> > Can you implement all the roles of all offices in a completely
> > automated system without too much hassle on normal game actions?
> I will leave the work of thinking about that to the Speaker.
Appa
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 22:13, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mill 0 - 9 = 2 using Land #48.
> I mill 8 / 4 = 2 using Land #68.
>
> I harvest 2235, a newly created CFJ number.
> I harvest 2237, a newly created CFJ number.
> I harvest 2238, a newly created CFJ number.
>
> That shoul
On 29 Oct 2008, at 12:44, Ed Murphy wrote:
I don't want to dump that into R2193 itself. Re-propose adding the
relevant bit somewhere in R2105 and I'll support.
Um, it's my Monster proposal. I'm Mad Scientist now.
--
ehird
The Notary's records still list Levi as party to the AFO. I'm pretty
sure we removed em a while back (e was no longer a player, and evidently
no longer following the game).
ehird wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2008, at 03:31, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>>> 5814 O 1 1.0 ehird i think the whale is a noun
>> AGAINST x 5
>
>
> why?
I don't want to dump that into R2193 itself. Re-propose adding the
relevant bit somewhere in R2105 and I'll support.
On 29 Oct 2008, at 03:31, Ed Murphy wrote:
5814 O 1 1.0 ehird i think the whale is a noun
AGAINST x 5
why?
--
ehird
29 matches
Mail list logo
