On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:26 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:27, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to send the following on behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ
> > 2203a, with the support of two of {woggle, Goethe, the CotC}:
> > {{{
> > This panel REMANDs CFJ 2203. The judge is instructed to consider whether
> > there were two plausible interpretations of what the vote meant, and if
> > so, whether this made the vote sufficiently ambiguous as to be entirely
> > ineffective, and also to consider the appelant's arguments.
> > }}}
>
> I support this.
>
Wrong intent, we have a newer one we're agreeing to...
--
ais523
