On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Warrigal violated the terms of the contract by deregistering,
>> resulting in em having fewer notes than markers. I suggest an equity
>> case.
>
> E has the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal violated the terms of the contract by deregistering,
> resulting in em having fewer notes than markers. I suggest an equity
> case.
E has the R101 right to do so...
On 28 Oct 2008, at 12:09, Elliott Hird wrote:
So the PBA is getting a 9 crop each week and the AFO - a non-
comrade - has given it a 0
crop. However, this doesn't affect the rates! Also, it makes it so
that the amount of
coins in existence aren't enough to withdraw everything.
Proto: rates s
So the PBA is getting a 9 crop each week and the AFO - a non-comrade
- has given it a 0
crop. However, this doesn't affect the rates! Also, it makes it so
that the amount of
coins in existence aren't enough to withdraw everything.
Proto: rates still change for non-comrade transfers, and the c
On 28 Oct 2008, at 02:08, Roger Hicks wrote:
The PV withdraw and subsequent transfer fail. All PV were destroyed
when ais523 won.
I was unaware. I will fix this.
--
ehird
5 matches
Mail list logo
