On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Warrigal violated the terms of the contract by deregistering, >> resulting in em having fewer notes than markers. I suggest an equity >> case. > > E has the R101 right to do so...
Yes, but that doesn't mean the situation is equitable (although it is now that Warrigal has destroyed eir credits and markers). -root
