tusho wrote:
> On 09/09/2008, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Therefore, no matter which noun you replace, you get in effect the same
>>> result. Michael for Monster!!! :)
>> Err, woot!
>>
>> Michael - someone better tell me what my awesome monsterly powers a
OscarMeyr wrote:
> I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the
> reevaluation of CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again?
woggle is correct, there wasn't any in a-b:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2008-September/013470.html
Goethe wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ihope wrote:
>> I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the first game shall be
>> Michael Norrish. I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the current
>> game of Agora shall be Michael Norrish.
>
> Someone really, really, really, really should put this in the
OscarMeyr wrote:
> My VLOP was 5 at the start of the week.
Caste is measured at the start of the voting period now.
On 09/09/2008, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Therefore, no matter which noun you replace, you get in effect the same
>> result. Michael for Monster!!! :)
>
> Err, woot!
>
> Michael - someone better tell me what my awesome monsterly powers are
You can deputize
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check
> agora-discussion archives for my brief old considerings). But
> basically, the record in 2107a suggested to me that the GUILTY
> judgment was believed correct by
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:55 PM, ihope wrote:
>
>> I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the first game shall be
>> Michael Norrish. I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the current
>> game of Agora shall be Michael Norri
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Therefore, no matter which noun you replace, you get in effect the same
result. Michael for Monster!!! :)
Err, woot!
Michael - someone better tell me what my awesome monsterly powers are
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 16:09, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the reevaluation of
> CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again?
I don't think I made any commentary to agora-business (check
agora-discussion archives fo
I don't see any commentary from H. Trial Judge woggle in the
reevaluation of CFJ 2107. Is the COTC database lagging me out again?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ihope wrote:
> I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the first game shall be
> Michael Norrish. I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the current
> game of Agora shall be Michael Norrish.
Someone really, really, really, really should put this in the FAQ.
Or make it an abb
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
>>> The Monster for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
>>
>> Beautiful and truly dangerous, given that monsters now have a fair
>> amount of power and Michael is sti
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:55 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the first game shall be
> Michael Norrish. I CFJ on the following: The Speaker for the current
> game of Agora shall be Michael Norrish.
See CFJ 1534.
-root
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:10 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
>> > The Monster for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
>>
>> Beautiful and truly dangerous, given that monsters now have a fair
>> am
I vote:
> 5688 O 1 1.0 Wooble Torches and Pitchforks
AGAINSTx1627
> 5689 D 0 3.0 The Monster The First Monster
FORx1627
> 5690 O 1 1.0 rootThe Angry Mob
AGAINSTx1626, SELL (1VP)
> 5691 O 1 1.0 comex The Kindly Mob
AGAINSTx1626, FORx1
> 5692 O
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:53 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:41 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, titled "R.I.P.", with adoption index
>> 1 and interest index 0: "Award a win to Randy Pausch."
>>
>> (Since Randy Pausch is no long
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> > The Monster for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
>
> Beautiful and truly dangerous, given that monsters now have a fair
> amount of power and Michael is still lurking.
Well, as far as I can tell t
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:49 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (/me wonders why the other Agorans playing B weren't also enterprising
> enough to do anything interesting with the fruits of my scam.)
I bought up all of the available assets before they noticed your scam.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because the Speaker isn't elected and can't be kicked out? -Goethe
Nonsense. It can be done with an AI=1 proposal to award someone a
win. Award it to Randy Pausch, even...
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 15:08 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are these B Nomic corporations also Agoran persons?
>
> Not yet, although I can freely amend their charters to make them
> devolve their responsibilities to their
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these B Nomic corporations also Agoran persons?
Not yet, although I can freely amend their charters to make them
devolve their responsibilities to their Sockholders, then I just have
to sucker some first-class person in
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:00, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I post the following Motions for each of the Brown, Burnt Sienna,
>> Beige, and Burgundy Corporations:
>>
>> {{
>> Authorize the CEO to cause the co
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> The Monster for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
Beautiful and truly dangerous, given that monsters now have a fair
amount of power and Michael is still lurking.
-Goethe
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would disagree. The contract reads:
>
> 15. Creating proposals or CFJs for the clear and primary purpose of
> Harvesting the ID numbers assigned is a breach of this contract.
>
> It doesn't specify who will be doing the har
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gratuitous arguments:
>
> tusho forgot e was a member of the AAA, and therefore is unlikely to
> have created the CFJs for the putpose of harvesting the ID numbers
> assigned. I argue that tusho created the CFJs so that /someone e
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:13 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > For September:
> > Default Officeholderais523
> > Justiciar (nobody)
> > Wielder of Veto BobTHJ
> > Wielder of Rubberstamp Zefram
> > Wielder of Extra Votes pikhq
>
> Have tusho and Levi lost MWP
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 03:43, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2107
>>
>> = Criminal Case 2107 =
>>
>>Ivan Hope v
ihope wrote:
> Also, claim of error:
>
>> Caller: Goethe
>> Barred: Ivan Hope
>>
>> Judge: Wooble
>> Judgement: GUILTY
>
> You left out the FINE part.
It includes Judge
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Choice? What choice? I think
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:34 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider what would happen if, in judging a criminal case, a judge
> said, "The defendant has stated that e has no intention to follow this
> rule in the future. Since ignoring this rule forever is a very serious
> offense, I senten
Also, claim of error:
> Caller: Goethe
> Barred: Ivan Hope
>
> Judge: Wooble
> Judgement: GUILTY
You left out the FINE part.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be willing to support REASSIGN for CJFs 2086-87.
I also recommend REASSIGN. Cases of ambiguity are precisely where
UNDECIDABLE is *not* appropriate, and the judge doesn't seem to know
this.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
32 matches
Mail list logo
