Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment

2008-08-17 Thread Quazie
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:17, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> X crops - 135 chits (no previous rate) >> >> This should probably b

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2115 judged UNDECIDABLE by woggle

2008-08-17 Thread Ed Murphy
Gratuituous counter-arguments: comex wrote: > If whether judging FALSE is illegal is UNDECIDABLE, then nobody can be > prosecuted for judging FALSE. Therefore, I recommend OVERRULE with a > replacement judgement of FALSE. > > If UNDECIDABLE is the only appropriate judgement, then FALSE is not a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment

2008-08-17 Thread Charles Reiss
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:17, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> X crops - 135 chits (no previous rate) > > This should probably be higher What would you suggest? - woggle

DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment

2008-08-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > X crops - 135 chits (no previous rate) This should probably be higher