Gratuituous counter-arguments: comex wrote:
> If whether judging FALSE is illegal is UNDECIDABLE, then nobody can be > prosecuted for judging FALSE. Therefore, I recommend OVERRULE with a > replacement judgement of FALSE. > > If UNDECIDABLE is the only appropriate judgement, then FALSE is not an > appropriate judgement, so the answer to this CFJ should be FALSE. But > then.... the point is, there is no judgement of the CFJ with certain > legality, so really UNDECIDABLE is no more appropriate than any other > judgement. The appropriateness of UNDECIDABLE does not depend on the appropriateness of FALSE-the-judgement, but on whether the statement's falsity-the-truth-value is logically undecidable. > You could also argue that IRRELEVANT is appropriate, because whether a > judgement is definitely legal or of paradoxical legality doesn't > matter, since it can't be prosecuted. Possibly, but an appropriate original judgement should stand, even if other judgements are also appropriate.
