On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmmso which was received first, this or my Water Rights enforcement?
>
> Wait, do we use Received: or is Date: presumptively correct?
Both the Date: and
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmso which was received first, this or my Water Rights enforcement?
Wait, do we use Received: or is Date: presumptively correct?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can giv
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/8 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hmmso which was received first, this or my Water Rights enforcement?
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
>
> comex's.
Nah, mine was received nearly a minute later.
2008/8/8 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmmso which was received first, this or my Water Rights enforcement?
>
> BobTHJ
>
comex's.
tusho
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:37 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO mills 6-4=2 using land #92.
> The AFO mills 8+5=2 using land #91.
> The AFO harvests 2118, 2119, 2120, 2121 (CFJ numbers) for 2 WRV each.
> The AFO mills 7/9=2 using land #61.
> The AFO mills 7*5=2 using land #50.
>
> I joi
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I destroy 2 WRV and the following lands in the AFO's possession:
> land #45
> Alaska
> land #91
> land #50
> land #43
> Alabama
> Strike Experiment 3.1
> land #60
> land #61
> land #38
> land #67
Damnit.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I nominate Wooble for the office of Rulekeepor.
>
> I decline this nomination. Making one batch of updates to the SLR was
> bad enough.
Hmm. By Rule 2154, if there are no consenting candidates, then there
is no action to
7 matches
Mail list logo
