On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2086a, 2087a: I intend to cause the panel to send this message:
>
> {
> The panel accepts appellant Zefram's arguments and judges 2086a and
> 2087a OVERRULE with a replacement judgement of TRUE.
> }
BobTHJ, ais523: Any chance
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against ihope for
> violating rule 1742.
Since Rule 1742 would allow only a sentence of DISCHARGE, why waste
everyone's time?
2008/8/3 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My arguments: UNIMPUGNED is appropriate. Merely not ascending is
> permissible, as long as I do ascend in a reasonable amount of time.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
I don't see anything in the rules about this.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With 2 support, I intend to initiate a criminal case against ihope for
> violating rule 1742.dmission, has not ascended the game and is not currently
> performing the action of
This fails, as you specified eitherascending t
There are no standing judges, and 2053 requires a judge. Anyone want
to sit up before the next rotation occurs?
5 matches
Mail list logo
