On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2086a, 2087a: I intend to cause the panel to send this message: > > { > The panel accepts appellant Zefram's arguments and judges 2086a and > 2087a OVERRULE with a replacement judgement of TRUE. > }
BobTHJ, ais523: Any chance of acting on this any time soon? A definite ruling that the previous judgment was inappropriate would make it a whole lot easier to judge the criminal case against the judge for making an inappropriate judgment.