Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Taral
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you be a little more specific about what the problem is here? What > about the PRS would you change, or what do you find to be scammable or > unbalanced? The PRS is regulated by the same "without three > objections" that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Roger Hicks
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Elliott Hird wrote: why? >>> >>> I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It shou

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hello, world

2008-06-28 Thread Charles Reiss
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:45 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> My VP is now 50 or above. >>> >>> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points. >> >> You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gav

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hello, world

2008-06-28 Thread comex
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> My VP is now 50 or above. >> >> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points. > > You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gave them to you > because he thought you desperately wanted to be out of the V

DIS: Re: BUS: Hello, world

2008-06-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My VP is now 50 or above. > > I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points. You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gave them to you because he thought you desperately wanted to be out of the Vote Market.

DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Taral
I object to ehird's, ihope's, and both of Quazie's attempts to make the PRS a contest. It would allow contests to persistently exceed the rules-mandated cap on number of awardable points. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Taral
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ihope wrote: >>Just to speed things along or something, I intend to make the Points >>Relay Service a contract with myself as contestmaster without three >>objections. > > I object. And here I thought you'd just reposted the same

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5577-5584

2008-06-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/6/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You can't vote on these proposals. Here's part of the distribution > message that you didn't quote: > > | The eligible voters for ordinary > |proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic > |proposal

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2032 assigned to woggle

2008-06-28 Thread Charles Reiss
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:25 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Comments please? >> >> Proto-judgment: > > It's a good proto-judgement. > > Too bad it doesn't yield my desired outcome... :( > > Have you considered Goe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Roger Hicks
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elliott Hird wrote: >>why? > > I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not > be granted the ability to award points. Points should only be awarded > for generally-approved subgames, but the PRS would

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5577-5584

2008-06-28 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: >>5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster! >AGAINSTx4 You can't vote on these proposals. Here's part of the distribution message that you didn't quote: | The eligible voters for ordinary |proposals are the active players, the el

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: >why? I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not be granted the ability to award points. Points should only be awarded for generally-approved subgames, but the PRS would open the way for anything to grant points. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1996 assigned to Ivan Hope

2008-06-28 Thread comex
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:44 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:03:27 -0400, comex gave Ivan >>Hope 50 pens > > Hmm, I thought this had been judged a long(ish) time ago. I was goin

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2032 assigned to woggle

2008-06-28 Thread comex
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Comments please? > > Proto-judgment: It's a good proto-judgement. Too bad it doesn't yield my desired outcome... :( Have you considered Goethe's argument wrt refusing to be a member to a contract?

DIS: Re: BUS: PRS

2008-06-28 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/6/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I object. > > -zefram > why?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration

2008-06-28 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: > You're a player, which is more than I >can say. Er, you just did say it. -zefram