On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Elliott Hird wrote: >>>> why? >>> >>> I have a problem with the laundering concept of the PRS. It should not >>> be granted the ability to award points. Points should only be awarded >>> for generally-approved subgames, but the PRS would open the way for >>> anything to grant points. >> >> I agree. I object to all pending attempts to make PRS a contest. > > Come to think of it, I also object to all such pending attempts (same > reasons). -Goethe > To Zefram, Goethe, Eris, and Wooble:
Can you be a little more specific about what the problem is here? What about the PRS would you change, or what do you find to be scammable or unbalanced? The PRS is regulated by the same "without three objections" that contests require. BobTHJ
