On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:07 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, there is no evidence that I've seen that anybody has agreed to
>> anything that happens to be a current subset of the rules
>
> The fact that we're
On 5/25/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >CFJ: R101 item i. reads:
> Denied.
It's a CFJ, not a claim of error-- in fact it was judged TRUE. You
are, of course, free to appeal it.
> Per CFJ 1955, there is no general mechanism giving effect to
> announcements of permitted a
On 5/25/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if I'd classify the PRS as a scamI don't have any
> > hidden agenda apart from providing a backing for existing contests and
> > permitting one per
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if I'd classify the PRS as a scamI don't have any
> hidden agenda apart from providing a backing for existing contests and
> permitting one person to administer multiple "contests" (or allowing
> non-players
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I intend without three objections to cause the AAA to cease to be a contest.
>>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend without three objections to cause the AAA to cease to be a contest.
>
> I object.
>
Any of you objectors care to explain yourselves?
BobTHJ
Proto-proto: Privatize the economy
(AI = 2, please)
Copy the current text of Rule 2126 (Notes) to an employment contract
with all players as parties, and a "parties CAN leave this contract
by announcement" clause, and changing "Notes are gained" to "Notes
are earned".
Amend Rule 2126 to regulate
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I agree to the Points Relay Service contract.
>>
>> ehird
>>
> I intend without three objections to make the Points Relay Service a contest.
I obj
On 5/24/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Accountor's Report
> > Date of last report: never
>
> Should I bother with a claim of error, since the Accountor has
> previously issued a report?
Oh, I'd forgotten abou
10 matches
Mail list logo
