On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:27 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made my comment in a-d-- does it count as "acting"? If I am not
> allowed to truthfully describe the game in any forum, does that
> violate my R101 right of participation in the fora?
By the way, if it is ruled that the cont
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:09 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to me the contract is basically unenforceable. R1742, which
> > requires its parties to adhere to it, has lower power than Rule 105,
> > whic
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:22 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree to the following: "All players SHALL act as if this paragraph
> >
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me the contract is basically unenforceable. R1742, which
> requires its parties to adhere to it, has lower power than Rule 105,
> which restricts the ways by which entities can become rules.
Nonsense. The contr
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:22 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree to the following: "All players SHALL act as if this paragraph
> > were a rule with power 1 and ID number 2206."
>
> I refuse to agree to this.
I
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:58 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not everybody likes a nomic where taking advantage of loopholes is
> explicitly encouraged.
One-liner: Then what are you doing here?
I've been watching Agora Nomic for a while. While I wouldn't say that
taking advantage of lo
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:58 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> everybody likes a nomic where taking advantage of loopholes is
> explicitly encouraged.
:x
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:22 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following: "All players SHALL act as if this paragraph
> were a rule with power 1 and ID number 2206."
I refuse to agree to this.
-root
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I initiate a criminal case against the above pledge for violating Rule
> 2029 by not Dancing a Powerful Dance.
Fails. The defendant must be a person.
> I initiate a criminal case against myself for violating Rule 2029 by
> n
On 4/25/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The above notwithstanding, while a currency's deposit rate
> is less than a withdrawal rate, that currency cannot be
> exchanged for pens, nor vice versa.
Do you mean "less than its withdrawal rate"?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> {
> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
> appropriate for when the ninny has failed to do something that e was
> required to do or in other situations with a similar severity as FINE.
> When in effect
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:41 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, if this had worked, an equity case could have been initiated
> > demanding that the AFO destroy all the pens created this way.
>
> I'd hope a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:41 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if this had worked, an equity case could have been initiated
> demanding that the AFO destroy all the pens created this way.
I'd hope a judge wouldn't rule in favor of anyone bringing such a
case; why have contracts at all
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
>> appropriate for when the ninny has failed to do something that e was
>> required to do or in other situations with a sim
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Division table - finite field of integers modulo 10
Er, that should read "finite ring of integers modulo 10", since that
particular ring is not a field.
-root
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gah. Misclick. This was supposed to be in there:
> Add the following in rule 1504 after the paragraph with the word
> "FINE":
> {
> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
> appropriate for when the ninn
Gah. Misclick. This was supposed to be in there:
Add the following in rule 1504 after the paragraph with the word
"FINE":
{
* COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
appropriate for when the ninny has failed to do something that e was
required to do or in other situations with a
{
* COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
appropriate for when the ninny has failed to do something that e was
required to do or in other situations with a similar severity as FINE.
When in effect, the ninny is in the chokey from one week after the
sentence takes effect to the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I change the deposit/withdrawal rates for 0 crops from 58.25/64.39
> to 64/58.
>
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO withdraws 10 crops for 580 pens.
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO with
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO withdraws 10 crops for 580 pens.
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO withdraws 10 crops for 580 pens.
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO w
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO deposits 10 crops for 640 pens.
> The AFO withdraws 10 crops for 580 pens.
Precedent is that seed must be specified even if the AFO or BoA holds
only one type of crop. Therefore, all this deposit/withdrawal stuff
fai
21 matches
Mail list logo
