DIS: Recusals

2007-10-04 Thread Ed Murphy
CFJ 1735 is well overdue for recusal. CFJs 1752-3 and 1756-7 will also be eligible for recusal within the next 24 hours.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1763: assign comex

2007-10-04 Thread Taral
On 10/4/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way, I would like to quote the initiator on the following, > which can easily be generalized to inquiry cases: Easily? Depends on your point of view, I suppose. Also, I *did* provide a case. Two rules. :D -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-10-04 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: On 10/4/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The AFO nominates Levi, Peekee, and pikhq for Ambassador, Herald, and IADoP. So you are nominating each person for all three offices? Yes. (Well, the AFO is.)

DIS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1763: assign comex

2007-10-04 Thread comex
On 10/4/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ 1738. TRUE. Even if not for that, I believe that publishing a > big statement purporting to resolve a decision but including in the > statement something false about it would be sufficient to resolve it > without violating 2149. By the way, I wo

DIS: Re: BUS: Nominations

2007-10-04 Thread comex
On 10/4/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The AFO nominates Levi, Peekee, and pikhq for Ambassador, Herald, > and IADoP. So you are nominating each person for all three offices?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: CFJs 1750-1751: recuse, assign Goddess Eris

2007-10-04 Thread Zefram
Taral wrote: >I don't want them. You're welcome to submit pseudo-judgements. I'll >send you the blue if you do. May I draw your attention to the case transfer procedure in R2164. Designed to avoid the need for pseudo-judgements. -zefram