On 10/4/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ 1738. TRUE. Even if not for that, I believe that publishing a > big statement purporting to resolve a decision but including in the > statement something false about it would be sufficient to resolve it > without violating 2149.
By the way, I would like to quote the initiator on the following, which can easily be generalized to inquiry cases: On 8/22/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would first like to state that I dislike being handed criminal cases > with no case being made by the prosecution. I know this is permitted, > but it's obnoxious.
