Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On 9/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to call for the appeal of CFJ 1741.
I vote OBJECT
Not to the proper forum, but this would be ineffective in any case
since an appeal can be brough
On 9/19/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not to the proper forum, but this would be ineffective in any case
> since an appeal can be brought with 2 support and doesn't require
> Agoran Consent; objections are irrelevant.
>
>
Indeed, it appears 90% of the actions I take in Agora are
On 9/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I intend, with 2 support, to call for the appeal of CFJ 1741.
> >
> I vote OBJECT
Not to the proper forum, but this would be ineffective in any case
since an appeal can be brought with 2 support
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to call for the appeal of CFJ 1741.
>
I vote OBJECT
BobTHJ
I vote as follows:
> 5225 O1 1Goddess Er Lying down on the job III
FOR * 9
> 5226 O1 1BobTHJ Lie Down
PRESENT
> 5227 O1 1Peekee Get some colors.
AGAINST * 9
> 5228 O0 1rootCitizenship cleansing
PRESENT
> 5229 D1 3rootEarly announcement o
5 matches
Mail list logo
