Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On 9/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to call for the appeal of CFJ 1741.
I vote OBJECT
Not to the proper forum, but this would be ineffective in any case
since an appeal can be brought with 2 support and doesn't require
Agoran Consent; objections are irrelevant.
I've been confused by this recently. The closest thing to defining the phrase
'with 2 support' is in rule 2124 where With N Supporters is defined. This seems
related to a Dependent Action and can be voted on (both SUPPORT and OBJECT).
Does this make it a dependent action? or does it need to explictly say?
Levi
