Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: On 9/6/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: "When the CotC recuses a judge with cause, e CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement." Doesn't say when e can do so. The first clause is "when the CotC recuses a judge with cause"; I'd assume that's

Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread comex
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > Changing the "CAN" to "CAN and SHALL" would preserve the intent of the > original proto better though, IMO. SHALL is sufficient, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

DIS: Agoran Patent title Revisionism

2007-09-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
root wrote: > > 5219 O0 1Zefram patent title cleanup > FOR x 4 I'm curious why you support whitewashing certain bits of Agoran history (e.g. "boor", "Zeitgeist") while keeping others ("honorless worm"), all of these were "temporary" in the sense that Zefram describes them. Yet more i

Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On 9/6/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >"When the CotC recuses a judge with cause, e CAN flip that player's > >posture to supine by announcement." > > Doesn't say when e can do so. The first clause is "when the CotC recuses a judge with cause"; I'd assume that's when e c

Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >"When the CotC recuses a judge with cause, e CAN flip that player's >posture to supine by announcement." Doesn't say when e can do so. I suggest "When the CotC has recused a judge with cause in the past week, e CAN ..." or "When a judge has been recused with cause in the past we

Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Taral wrote: When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine. Such an automatic posture change loses some of the safety of the current system that distinguishes between VALID and LEGAL. I'd prefer to have an explicit step here. "When the CotC recuses a judge with c

Re: DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Zefram
Taral wrote: > When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine. Such an automatic posture change loses some of the safety of the current system that distinguishes between VALID and LEGAL. I'd prefer to have an explicit step here. -zefram

DIS: Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job

2007-09-06 Thread Taral
Proto-Proposal: Lying down on the job Add the following paragraph to the end of Rule 1871 (The Standing Court): When a judge is recused with cause, e becomes supine. (Players can make themselves sitting right away if they want.) -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there'

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to publish IADoP's report

2007-09-06 Thread Roger Hicks
On 9/6/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > comex consented to become Herald, but no one has voted SUPPORT or > > OBJECT yet. > > I vote SUPPORT. > > --Wooble > I vote SUPPORT as well BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to publish IADoP's report

2007-09-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Clerk of the Courts Wasn't there a recent nomination for this? *looks* Yes, comex nominated Peekee on August 30; I'd mis-filed it under Herald. Fixed now. comex consented to become Herald, but no one has voted SUPPORT or OBJECT yet.

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to publish Scorekeepor's report

2007-09-06 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >Scores in parentheses are applicable if Levi won on August 20. That appeal isn't getting very far. Can we start assuming that e did win now? -zefram