On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 04:46:15PM -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Urm, uh
>
> Being that B Nomic had been dead for almost 3 months, I didn't think
> it would hurt to just go ahead and make it a protectorate without
> putting it to a vote. It appears the formerly inactive players have
> come out o
On 6/22/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This *almost* asks for a return of Disinterested proposals, probably better
implemented in the current game state as Unanimous Consent: An AI-1
proposal that passes if nobody votes against it, but doesn't gain VCs.
I'm not sure I follow.
OscarMeyr wrote:
> As a pirate (in an MMO game), I have to point out that most pirates
> fly black colors, and would NEVER refer to the colors as a
> "pennant." The slang term is "sheet," for ex-navy the term is
> "ensign," and for landlubbers the term is "flag." But "pennant" --
> never
Urm, uh
Being that B Nomic had been dead for almost 3 months, I didn't think
it would hurt to just go ahead and make it a protectorate without
putting it to a vote. It appears the formerly inactive players have
come out of the woodwork to oppose that action.
Anyway, my Ambassadorial plea was
On Jun 20, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 6/20/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frankly, it's far more of an abuse that a single natural player can
accumulate 13x (or arbitrarily more) base voting power on
something through
free submission of trivial fix proposals. That's m
What did you do, BobTHJ? I want to pull up a lawnchair.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Jun 22, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
I therefore extend a call to any Players who would be willing to
become dual-citizens of Agora and B-Nomic, and help to influence the
populace of B...
Translation: Avast, me hearties! They've gone and seen through
our clever
On 6/22/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After looking at the fora of the proposed/possible protectorates, I'm a
little concerned at the conflict of interest involved with the particular
events in those fora. Proto:
Amend Rule 2147 by replacing:
A player of said nomic may then
After looking at the fora of the proposed/possible protectorates, I'm a
little concerned at the conflict of interest involved with the particular
events in those fora. Proto:
Amend Rule 2147 by replacing:
A player of said nomic may then cause that nomic to
become a Protectorate by a
BobTHJ wrote:
> LIST OF PROTECTORATES
> ---
> B Nomic (since Jun 14, 2007)
> Primo Corporation (since Jun 19, 2007)
> Gunner Nomic (since Jun 21, 2007, disputed)
This list should regularly include locations/methods for contacting each
Nomic (e.g. fora locations, em
BobTHJ wrote:
> I therefore extend a call to any Players who would be willing to
> become dual-citizens of Agora and B-Nomic, and help to influence the
> populace of B...
Translation: Avast, me hearties! They've gone and seen through our clever
ruse. Hoist the red pennant, for we take no pris
Most Honourable Agora,
I write to you not as a holder of any office, but simply as a Player of
B Nomic, which as of 14/06/2007 has become a protectorate of Agora.
Let me start by stating that personally I am not opposed to the idea of
being protected by Agora, it is evident to me that up to now
On Friday 22 June 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > The following issues are also pending:
> >
> > * HP2's judgement of CFJ 1647
> > * comex's judgement of CFJ 1611
> > * Assignment of CFJs 1688-94
>
> Also, assignment of a Board of Appeals to CFJ 1684.
I would prefer not to do this until the CotC
13 matches
Mail list logo
