On 4/19/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4930 | Simple VC win | Goethe| 1* | 02Apr07 | D
4931 | Herald to advertise | Zefram| 1 | 04Apr07 | O
4932 | Clarifying Excess CFJs | Levi | 1 | 05Apr07 | O
4933 | constrained refusal of e...
On Apr 20, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Zefram wrote:
H. Promotor, I hereby submit the following proposal, entitled "slim
the
map", and set its AI to 1.1:
I'm voting against this, because I don't see Zefram adding emself to
the map in this proposal.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Zefram wrote:
You've missed two proposals from me:
* "avoid precedence paradoxes and bugs too", submitted on 2007-04-08
and AI set to 3 on 2007-04-10
* "resurrect the Assessor", submitted on 2007-04-11
-zefram
Thanks for the correction. I'm not sure how I mis
For some really odd reason, Goethe, your well-researched analysis
struck me as very funny. (I'm laughing with you at the whole
situation.)
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Apr 23, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
---|---Distributable
Proposals---|---||-|-
---|-Non-distributable
Proposals-|---||-|-
The concept of non-distributable proposals has been abolished. The
only
menti
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I am willing to change my votes in return for tangible
offers.
What constitutes tangibility?
That's a very good point, seeing as this game is entirely intangible.
Promises to do something at a later date don't se
6 matches
Mail list logo
