Goethe wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Goethe is deemed to have been
deregistered due to Rule 1789
Ya better hope my vote isn't the deciding one on this... congrats,
Murphy! -G.
On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
King me!
Congratulations.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
Awesome!
On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proposal: The Lady, or the Tiger?
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Goethe is deemed to have been
deregistered due to Rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus) as of the posting of
Murphy's message on or about Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:44:10 -0800; unles
On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H. Promotor OscarMeyr, are you still out there? There are a number
of proposals waiting to be distributed.
Partially my fault. There was a DNS hiccup a few days ago that
prevented em from reaching the database.
-root
Would anyone like to be CotC for a while? I can continue to maintain
the database, since it's non-trivial to relocate. It'd also be nice
to get a Speakership out of this win (R402), which would require my
giving up the Clerkship (R1450).
H. Promotor OscarMeyr, are you still out there? There ar
On 12/21/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Claustronomic has the current membership:
Kolja Speaker
Goethe Voter
Elysion Voter
MaudVoter
RedKnight Voter
Murphy Voter
SherlockVoter
I don't know the current score.
|+---#---+| Nomic h
Quazie wrote:
I make a CFJ on the following statement
CFJ 1594 has been judged.
I assign this CFJ to Goethe.
I publicly note the following:
* Both Goethe and Sherlock presented reasonable interpretations
of Rule 1789. Which of these interpretations we apply is
determined by which
On 12/21/06, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't remember this one.
It was the nameless, turned-based nomic with an attempt
at a thimble economy.
--
Michael Slone
On 12/21/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eris wrote:
> Forget that. If I were still registered I'll allege that Goethe
> had won by paradox.
I don't think it's a paradox. At the moment, I merely made a
statement ("judgement") that is invalid, think of it as a proto-
judgement. If a
On 12/21/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|+---#---+| Nomic has the current membership and turn order:
Taral
I don't remember this one.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
> Here is a question: should the nature of the logo be specified in the
> rules? I'm thinking "yes", personally.
To be honest, if it was, I don't think I'd vote for the current one. It's not
bad, but nothing I'd support as the one and only logo.
I'm off for a couple of days. Merry Christmas, A
--- Manuel Lanctot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >
> > [Agora logo]
>
> Thanks! I've added it to the wiki.
>
Here is a question: should the nature of the logo be specified in the
rules? I'm thinking "yes", personally.
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island
--- Jonathan Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taral wrote:
> > Write one! I'll put it up.
>
> I have no HTML skills, but would be happy to help with content for
> such a page if someone else were to code it.
>
Ah! Well, I have HTML skills, but hate writing content. Shall we dance?
God bless,
T
--- Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said, what would people be interested in experimenting with in
> the near future? Economics? Internomic relations? Or something other
> than what I can think of off the top of my head?
>
I was thinking of proposing an "Agoran civilian militia" w
On 12/21/06, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you should set $wgLogo to the URL path to that logo.
Never mind, caching problem.
--
Michael Slone
On 12/21/06, Manuel Lanctot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks! I've added it to the wiki.
I think you should set $wgLogo to the URL path to that logo.
--
Michael Slone
On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy wrote:
[Agora logo]
Thanks! I've added it to the wiki.
17 matches
Mail list logo
