Quazie wrote:
I make a CFJ on the following statement
CFJ 1594 has been judged.
I assign this CFJ to Goethe.
I publicly note the following:
* Both Goethe and Sherlock presented reasonable interpretations
of Rule 1789. Which of these interpretations we apply is
determined by which of eir purported judgements was effective.
* If the purported Writ of FAGE was successful in deregistering
Goethe, then Sherlock's judgement was effective; but then the
purported Writ of FAGE was unsuccessful. Contradiction.
* If the purported WoF was unsuccessful, then Goethe's judgement
was effective; but then the purported WoF was successful. Again,
contradiction.
* The question of whether Goethe is still a player cannot be
determined with finality. Thus, the legality of assigning
Goethe as judge of the CFJ above cannot be determined with
finality, either.
King me!
