Re: [AFMUG] Sync 900 MHz PMP100 and PTP450i?

It can be done. You have to match the 450i sync timing to the FSK timing. It’s either .25 or .5ms...I can never remember. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com > On May 15, 2020, at 12:49 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: > >  > Is the PTP450i in th

Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber11 Coax Cable Kit

IIRC, those were EOL’ed some time ago. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com > On May 14, 2020, at 6:45 PM, Chuck Macenski wrote: > >  > I don't know the answer, but I suggest an email to supp...@ui.com might be in > order. > >> On Thu, May

Re: [AFMUG] Sync 900 MHz PMP100 and PTP450i?

900mhz FSK = 5ms frame all other FSK = 2.5ms frame On 5/15/2020 9:25 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: It can be done.  You have to match the 450i sync timing to the FSK timing.  It’s either .25 or .5ms...I can never remember. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell j

Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack

Only us Navy guys will get that reference. Thank you, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 10:20 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack Midrats? From:

Re: [AFMUG] Sync 900 MHz PMP100 and PTP450i?

We did it for a long time to colocate our 100 caps with our 450 caps. Our last 5.7 100 series is gone and I don't think I have the settings recorded anymore. I know on the 450 we had to push link distance out to 14 miles (14/75%/2/2). If you use that in the link calc you should be able to find a

Re: [AFMUG] Sync 900 MHz PMP100 and PTP450i?

Get a Syncpipe delux or a CNpulse... One and done! On 5/14/20 4:51 PM, cg...@graytechsoftware.com wrote: I have a PTP450i feeding a small site with a PMP100 AP. Is it possible to sync PTP450i and PMP100? Can I pull sync off the PTP450i slave into the PMP100 AP? Thank you - Chris -- AF

Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack

Tecate ice cream ? Helada, helado... From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:46 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: [AFMUG] OT..snack Tortillas, queso y aguacuate con una Tecate helada! Yum yum ---

[AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

https://www.rrmediagroup.com/Features/FeaturesDetails/FID/992 -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] CCR2004 coming out

Baltic does not have any native x86 Mikrotik Router. They are using CHR on the Maxxwave Vengence appliance, which works remarkably well. On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:52 AM Josh Luthman wrote: > Baltic seems to be the go to for x86 Mikrotik. He seems to always be on > top of it. > > Josh Luthman >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

Is this band directly adjacent to the 900mhz ISM band? And if so does that mean we can apply for a special FCC license with the FCC and then cambium can make us some "special-firmware" for pmp450-900mhz hardware? I really could use some more spectrum in that band for the 900mhz AP's that I do have.

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

Oo 6MHz... On 5/15/20 11:14 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: Is this band directly adjacent to the 900mhz ISM band? And if so does that mean we can apply for a special FCC license with the FCC and then cambium can make us some "special-firmware" for pmp450-900mhz hardware? I really could use som

Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack

No...it was 8:00 pm more or less after a hike. On Thu, May 14, 2020, 8:20 PM Ken Hohhof wrote: > Midrats? > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 8:47 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT..snack > > > > Tortillas, queso y

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

I couldn't find any decent explanation of what this actually is anywhere, but I'm pretty certain that wouldn't be an option. On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:14 AM Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > Is this band directly adjacent to the 900mhz ISM band? And if so does that > mean we can apply for a special FCC

Re: [AFMUG] OT Portlandia

Bikini masks might be the only way we’ll get some idiots to even consider wearing a mask. -Sean On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:16 PM James Howard wrote: > I gotta say. I went to Menards today and had to use one of their $1 masks > they sell you at the door……. Those things are horrible……. > > > >

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

Sounds like it will be county by county license. And you have to relocate others. Sounds expensive. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:08 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules I couldn't find any decent explanatio

Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack

Sorry, I can’t claim that honor. From: AF On Behalf Of Brian Webster Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:31 AM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack Only us Navy guys will get that reference. Thank you, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com

Re: [AFMUG] OT Portlandia

I forgive these ladies for their misuse of PPE.  I think we can sacrifice 5 or 6 masks for this purpose. On 5/14/2020 7:56 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Well, I thought certainly that’s so stupid, I won’t get any results if I Google it.  Wrong! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8185541/Co

Re: [AFMUG] FCC Approves 900 MHz Realignment Rules

Yeah, and it sounds to me like it's a 3/3mhz TX/RX pair, not actually 6mhz... probably not very useful for fixed wireless internet service. On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:33 AM wrote: > Sounds like it will be county by county license. And you have to relocate > others. Sounds expensive. > > *From:

Re: [AFMUG] OT..snack

Ha! On Fri, May 15, 2020, 8:57 AM wrote: > Tecate ice cream > ? > Helada, helado... > > *From:* Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:46 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT..snack > > Tortillas, queso y aguacuate con una Tecate helada! Yum yum > > -

Re: [AFMUG] OT Portlandia

Well, they will sell them back to you after the photo shoot... From: Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:40 AM To: af@af.afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Portlandia I forgive these ladies for their misuse of PPE. I think we can sacrifice 5 or 6 masks for this purpose. On 5/14/2020

[AFMUG] WiFi Calling Broken

Anybody else seeing this? Very recently-over the last several days to a week, WiFi calling has gotten flaky, and now just won't connect. Absolutely no network or firewall changes, Mikrotik CCR core routing. appears to be both AT&T and VZW. iPhones, maybe Android too. (Thought I'd post this properl

Re: [AFMUG] WiFi Calling Broken

I have not, if anything mine on Verizon has gotten much more stable lately. > On May 15, 2020, at 5:35 PM, Jeremy Grip wrote: > > Anybody else seeing this? Very recently-over the last several days to a > week, WiFi calling has gotten flaky, and now just won't connect. Absolutely > no network or

Re: [AFMUG] Erratic Upload signal in cnmaestro

Have you upgraded to 16.2 and the latest cnmaestro? On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:16 PM Sam Lambie wrote: > > I have a customer that has been complaining of 1-2 second regular hiccups > in his service. We moved his antenna thinking it might be bouncing the > signal off the propanel roof, but cnmaest

Re: [AFMUG] Erratic Upload signal in cnmaestro

Nope, I have heard that 16.2 is not that stable. cnmaestro is current as of 2 weeks ago. Everything else on the network is 16.1 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:49 PM Sean Heskett wrote: > Have you upgraded to 16.2 and the latest cnmaestro? > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:16 PM Sam Lambie wrote: > >> >>

Re: [AFMUG] Erratic Upload signal in cnmaestro

Can you be a little more specific about the erratic or flapping upload signal? How many dB is it varying, and does the downlink signal level stay constant while the uplink signal changes? Usually RF path issues like reflections, trees, rain, etc. affect both directions. Does the signal vari

Re: [AFMUG] Erratic Upload signal in cnmaestro

The reason I ask about software version is there is a known issue 16.x. It’s just a reporting issue not an actual issue and the graphs look exactly like what you posted. 16.2 is very stable and gets rid of the funky graphs. -Sean On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:19 PM Sam Lambie wrote: > Nope, I hav

[AFMUG] EPMP and that weird ARP Failure

We had storms roll through last night, and I had 2EPMP 1000 radios fail in to the 'I'm going to steal every MAC address on the AP' It's been a year or so without this failure, so I thought maybe it was fixed in firmware, but these were radios on new firmware, but they were both EPMP1000 units.

Re: [AFMUG] Erratic Upload signal in cnmaestro

Ah hah! I added the user to our SNMP monitoring system and didn't see anything like what cnmaestro was reporting. So I'll totally believe you Sean. Thanks. Time for yet another mass upgrade... On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:56 PM Sean Heskett wrote: > The reason I ask about software version is there