:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of
Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 4:13 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
One thing I'll miss about Mikrotik is every router can use every feature.
On 3/1/2021 3
card in a low end MX router. The MIC can be had for less than four grand, as
> can an older MX router. That should be good for CGNAT needs under 9 Gbps.
>
>
> - Jared
>
>
>
>
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2021 at 1:41 PM
> From: "Adam Moffett"
> To: af@
PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
One thing I'll miss about Mikrotik is every router can use every feature.
On 3/1/2021 3:52 PM, fiber...@mail.com wrote:
I guess it depends on what kind of NAT you want to do.
Here's an overview of CGNAT implementa
front to run
all Cambium M and Terragraph for our WISP side lol
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 11:06 AM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
It's 5 digit numbers, however you choose to label it.
The good news i
them to repair.
>>>>
>>>> Which makes the 1072 a no starter for anything conn track for us ever
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve got one 2004 doing the CGNAT now, and it’s on latest Stable release.
>>>> Watching to s
and whistles.
> >
> > - Jared
> >
> >> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2021 at 3:31 PM
> >> From: "Adam Moffett"
> >> To: af@af.afmug.com
> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
> >>
> >> Maybe I was misinformed.
>
l Message-
From: AF On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 4:13 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
One thing I'll miss about Mikrotik is every router can use every feature.
On 3/1/2021 3:52 PM, fiber...@mail.com wrote:
> I guess it dep
et started with a MS-MIC-16G , but it doesn't have the throughput of
later cards nor all the bells and whistles.
- Jared
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2021 at 3:31 PM
From: "Adam Moffett"
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Maybe I was misinformed.
Th
: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Eh, it depends on what you're trying to do with it, as always.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.
ed
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2021 at 3:31 PM
> From: "Adam Moffett"
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
>
> Maybe I was misinformed.
>
> The VAR told me JunOS would only do 1:1 NAT unless you had an IP
> Services card, and
S and/or direct switch VLAN type segmentation of layer2 into our cores where we will do all of the heavy lifting.
From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Kenney
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
To: af [mailto:af@af.afmug.com]
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limi
;Adam Moffett"
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
I should have said it's 5 digits on top of having a Juniper router which can
accept the IP services card (eg MX240, MX480, or MX960). You'll be into 6
digits before you have the whole BOM. Mayb
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Steven Kenney
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots. New
hardware didn't fix it, had several people check the configs all
were good. After 2 mo
12:47:08 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Just word to the wise - prepare to ditch Mikrotik as soon as you near 10Gbps
traffic. Their upper echelon hardware doesn't pass the muster.
logo
STEVEN KENNEY
DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158
where we will do all of the heavy
lifting.
From: AF
On Behalf Of Steven Kenney
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
To:
t
From: "Adam Moffett"
To: "af"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 1:42:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
+1
On 3/1/2021 1:41 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
Yeah, that’s why there is justification for using Mikrotik “garbage”.
Mikrotik has got u
cobson"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 12:41:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Yeah, that’s why there is justification for using Mikrotik “garbage”.
Mikrotik has got us where we are and allowed us to grow and grow
our WISP side lol
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 11:06 AM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
It's 5 digit numbers, however you choose to label it.
The good news is one box will scale to staggering amounts of tr
rect switch VLAN type
segmentation of layer2 into our cores where we will do all of the
heavy lifting.
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Steven Kenney
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboot
: Monday, March 1, 2021 11:06 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
It's 5 digit numbers, however you choose to label it.
The good news is one box will scale to staggering amounts of traffic.
On 3/1/2021 1:03 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Corvette money. Is
Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
It's 5 digit numbers, however you choose to label it.
The good news is one box will scale to staggering amounts of traffic.
On 3/1/2021 1:03 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Corvette money. Is that anything like cubic dollars?
bp
On 3/1/2021 9:51 AM, Adam Moffe
ng.
But our end game it MPLS/VPLS and/or direct switch VLAN type
segmentation of layer2 into our cores where we will do all of the
heavy lifting.
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Steven Kenney
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still fig
To: af
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still
fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots. New
hardware didn't fix it, had
ing it for the
time being.
But our end game it MPLS/VPLS and/or direct switch VLAN type
segmentation of layer2 into our cores where we will do all of the
heavy lifting.
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Steven Kenney
*Sent:* Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik Officia
: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
To: af
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots. New hardware didn't fix
it, had several people check the configs all were good. After 2 months of going
back and forth, escalating to a higher tier tech..
7-9283
W: www.wavedirect.net
From: "Bill Prince"
To: "af"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 12:05:13 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
You have 6K subs doing NAT? That is more than I would attempt.
bp
On 3/1/2021 8:54 AM, Steven Kenney wrote:
About 6k
W:
www.wavedirect.net
From: "Bill Prince"
To: "af"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 11:
NECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N | Leamington ON
E: st...@wavedirect.org | P: 519-737-9283
W: www.wavedirect.net
From: "Jan-GAMs"
To: "af"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 12:00:08 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
What happens if you use an earl
gt;
*STEVEN KENNEY *
DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N |
Leamington ON
E: st...@wavedirect.org | P: 519-737-9283
W: www.wavedirect.net
*From: *"Bill Prince"
*To: *"
"af"
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 11:35:02 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
I have to admit, I don't know that I've looked too much at he number of
connections. How many subs does it take to achieve a million connections?
bp
On 3/1/2021 8:02 AM, St
Title: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Bill,
Just checked my main PPPoE server (CCR1036). 2735 PPPoE sessions. 504 of those are private IP addresses getting NAT. 1,048,576 connections
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:m...@mailmt.com
Myakka Technologies
I have to admit, I don't know that I've looked too much at he
number of connections. How many subs does it take to achieve a
million connections?
bp
On 3/1/2021 8:02 AM, Steven Kenney
wrote:
Still fighting with Mikrotik
Kenney
Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:02 AM
To: af
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official
Limitations
Still fighting with Mikrotik about t
9:02 AM
To: af
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots. New hardware didn't fix
it, had several people check the configs all were good. After 2 months of going
back and forth, escalating to a higher tier tech... I officially
Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots. New hardware didn't fix
it, had several people check the configs all were good. After 2 months of going
back and forth, escalating to a higher tier tech... I officially got a response
that 1 million connections is too much for the 1072 and I s
35 matches
Mail list logo
