I have had that issue under certain shells (i believe perhaps ksh) - it
seems to work fine for me under csh though. perhaps this is what is
affecting you.
though - there was a recent discussion here about a more "proper" way to
do it - which would be to modify your inittab entry
i.e.:
lsitab d
Doesn't 5L have a linux compatibility mode? could you use the linux
client? (complete speculation)
-j
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Fred Johanson wrote:
> My AIX guy tried it. It wouldn't install.
>
>
> At 11:11 AM 5/15/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> > Does anyone know if TSM wil
Hello - there was a discussion in the fall of 2000 (i think sept-nov time
period) about the merits of both.
serach for "would you buy tsm again"
that is the suggestion from the mailing list archives
(http://www.adsm.org)
-j
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) wrote:
> Hi
> STEPHEN
>
There already exists / did exist one AdsM/TSM related perl module - though
I believe its author has fallen off the face of the earth or
something. (Never responds to e-mail.)
I vote for your second approach: Create a TSM modules, then have specific
capabilities be part of derived modules - ala
On windows you can compile grep from the gnu distro. There is cygwin
(check i think: http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/download.html) which
enables you to use all of your favorite unix tools on windows. I believe
there is also a full posix subsystem available for windows - which will
give you a
Could you clarify how you would add reiserfs to the list of valid
filesystems? Also - is that a plausible solution, i.e. would it actually
work?
Also, has anyone had any experience w/ ext3 and TSM? I would imagint that
due to its similarity to ext2, that it probably works - can anyone confirm
Is it possible to put this module in CPAN and/or start a sourceforge
project - so that those of us so inclined can update/develop the module /
A module into something truly worthwhile to the ADSM community?
Anyone want to volunteer?
-j
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Gerhard Rentschler wrote:
> Hi,
> wi
I am not working on a 7.0 system - so I may be slightly off, but I am
pretty sure that libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 is included in an rpm labeled:
compat-libstdc++-6.2-2.9.0.9.i386.rpm which is available at:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-7.0/i386/en/RedHat/RPMS/
-john
On Fri, 23 Feb 20
Michael,
I believe the X-lib dependencies are fine to ignore as long as you
do not wish to use the graphical interface (dsm). As for the
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys file, that is your client
configuration file. (Not sure if you are/were asking for help with that
error or just i
k in. Given this restraint, is there any advantage of
my 2B method over my 2A method?
Also, w/ regards to the checkout procedure, is my "move media"
version the simplest it can be? The reason I ask, is that it befuddles me
why I can't set access=offsite when i am using it to chec
our database backups?
>
> Orville L. Lantto
> Datatrend Technologies, Inc.
> 121 Cheshire Lane #700
> Minnetonka, MN 55305
> V: 952-931-1203
> F: 952-931-1293
> C: 612-770-9166
>
>
>
>
> John Marquart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor M
ib search=y status=scratch
> dsmadmc checkin libv 35_0lib search=y status=private
> Replace 35_0lib with the name of your library. For each private tape you
> will get a warning, because it can't be checked in as scratch. Ignore
> these warnings.
> 11) Ready. From time to time
Hello all,
I am about to upgrade my server to 4.1.4.x on an AIX system
running 4.3.3.8. I wanted to know if there are any thoughts on the
4.1.4.1 patch and/or on the 4.1.4.x series - or if it is recommended to go
with an earlier level of the 4.1.x.x series.
If anyone has thoughts/suggest
Please ppl - just because someone trolls the mailing list for potential
employees - does NOT mean we need to spend the rest of the day/week
contributing needless spam by responding in a public forum. If you are
interested or are not interested - and want to make that apparent -
please do so priv
You can find it at:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v3r7/Windows/v372/i386/single/
the files are IP21933_16*
-john
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Sterling James wrote:
> < Of the 3.7.2 levels, I recommend 3.7.2.16
>
>
>
> Where can you get 3.7.2.16, all
15 matches
Mail list logo
