On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:23:32PM -0500, Mark Stapleton wrote:
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/20/2006
> 02:28:17 PM:
> > Look at the "Tivoli Technical User Conference". It's in the spring
> > in the USA.
> > Never have gone so cannot say if it is worth it.
> >
> > Rob Berendt wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Kathleen M Hallahan wrote:
> I was actually just looking at the Baltimore conference listing for TSM
> content, and all I can find is one session on future directions. Is this
> an anomaly, or should I be looking somewhere else? Baltimore is close
> enoug
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:27:56PM -1000, Aaron Becar wrote:
> I have been reading some past archives about NDMP, and even more
> specifically, Mirapoint backups. I was wondering if anyone has a
> similar configuration with TSM and Mirapoint. We are just checking to
> make sure we have a suppor
meet our budget, and offsite requirements except for this.
Happy hunting, and I hope this helps people out there. Contact me offline
if you have any additional questions, or need further details.
Bob Booth
UIUC/CITES
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:59:34PM +1100, Paul Dudley wrote:
> OK - I tried the command
>
> label libvol lb1.1.0.3 checkin=scratch search=bulk labels=barcode
>
>
> and got the errors:
>
Check to see if the I/O slot is configured as a 'storage slot' in the library.
> 11/08/2006 13:54:24 ANR8
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Mackereth wrote:
> Hi Srinath,
>
> Try
>
> chfs -a size=+G
>
> So something like
> chfs -a size=+50G /apps/tsm
>
> Will increase the /apps/tsm filesystem by 50Gb (if there is enough space in
> the Volume Group.)
>
AND... Assuming it is AIX.
What
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:37:59AM -, Gopinathan, Srinath wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> The OS which is running here is Solaris 5.9
>
Well, if it is a VXFS filesystem, you can use the Veritas LVM to extend
the FS. You may also be running Soltice which is basically VXFS under
t
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:59:20AM -0500, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> Windows is not in the picture. These are going to be RH Linux systems.
>
> We will probably perform EXPORT TO SERVER to move the clients, one by one,
> since we are probably going to move to new media types (3592 vs 3590) , as
Hello everone!
I'm not a Windows expert, and I have a customer that is having trouble
installing the latest TSM MSSQL Agent on Windows Server 2012 (fully patched).
They have the TSM client for Windows 7.1.1.3 when functions, until they
install the latest MSSQL agent 7.1.2.
When the TDP is instal
Hello all!
I'm trying to help a remote admin that is trying to exclude/include things
in windows filesystem for a scheduled monthly archive.
I will admit that I am not very familiar at all with how windows excludes
work, so I have not been much help, so I am asking the gurus!
He has a windows fi
t;
> regards,
> Rainer
>
>
>
> Von:Bob Booth
> An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Datum: 14.01.2016 19:59
> Betreff:[ADSM-L] Windows exclude.archive help
> Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>
> Hello all!
>
> I'
The 5.4 TSM client is now on the IBM ftp site. It does appear to have the
long awaited 'native' support for Intel based Macs. Hope it works.
cheers,
bob
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
> Look, before leaping into TSM 5.4 ...
> Cautionary/advisory Technotes are starting to appear for 5.4,
> as for example 1249083. Do a search, and pore over the Readme
> file, before committing to an install.
Agreed!
I cautioned the 1
I'm getting ready to do an upgrade from TSM 5.2.9 to TSM 5.3.4 and I am
really confused about the Oracle TDP license.
Do I still need a xxx.lic file for the TSM server, if so, where does it
live?
I have downloaded TSM 5.3 EE and the TSM 5.3 DP for Oracle from the PA
website. The only license fil
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:48:20PM -0600, David Bronder wrote:
> Bob Booth wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting ready to do an upgrade from TSM 5.2.9 to TSM 5.3.4 and I am
> > really confused about the Oracle TDP license.
>
> Just about the TDPO license? :)
Yeah.. really
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:35:14AM -0600, Bell, Charles (Chip) wrote:
> Quick question. If I delete a volume to get it back from a read-only access
> state into the scratch pool, will the next incremental backup for the node
> data affected back up those files again? Does the database know that the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:08:47AM -0600, Bell, Charles (Chip) wrote:
> I understand your question, and "why" you would ask... :)
>
> This is why...
> 03/09/07 10:05:38 ANR8944E Hardware or media error on drive 3592_1
> (/dev/rmt9) with volume V00040(OP=READ, Error Number
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 08:52:48AM -0600, Barnhart, Troy wrote:
> We're curious here in our shop... We are building a couple of servers for a
> new project that may do this also.
>
> How fast did this 1 TB backup? Is this with an AIX-TSM server? Diskpool
> Hardware? Tapepool Hardware?
Here i
A strange problem has just cropped up with an image backup on Linux.
The server is 5.3.4.2 running on AIX, and the linux client version is 5.2.2
(I know it is old, but we have some 'legacy' issues).
This just started happening, as it has been running literally for months
without any problems. Th
has gone wildly down
hill ever since.
IBM.. please listen to your customers, we have been giving you plenty of
warning. You can save yourself and us money and time, if you change your ways.
Bob Booth
University of Illinois - Urbana
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:19:34PM -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> It's been politely pointed out to me that grousing at folks who take
> time off to come to Oxford isn't likely to make them feel happy about
> coming to Oxford. Good point.
Agreed.
That said,
Talk to your BP's, SE's and anyone els
t db2adutl
deleting backups and archive logs immediately seem to be incorrect.
We are running DB2 V8.2 on Solaris, TSM 5.3.4 API/Client, and TSM 5.3.4 server
on AIX.
Any insight would be very much appreciated.
TIA,
Bob Booth
UIUC
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Gerald wrote:
> Ultimately i'm trying to run an import on 23 LTO tapes which is going
> too slow and i'm trying to determine why. When it first started for
> the first 16 tapes or so, I was seeing 30MB/sec+ import speed. On
> Friday I noticed a lot of I/O a
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:00:57PM +0200, CAYE PIERRE wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> Try move nodedata which can move data's even from copystg to another copystg
I wish it did this! In my current 5.3 server, I would love to be able to
move copy storage pool volumes to another copy storage pool. There is no
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:01:16PM -0500, Johnny Lea wrote:
> Has anyone used SATA drives for primary storage. Is it really a bad idea?
We use 7200RPM SAN attahced SATA arrays for our TDP primary pools, 1.5TB.
No problems so far.
hth,
bob
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Does anyone know if the DB2 API and TDP SQL backups manage their own
> expiration like RMAN does i.e RMAN does not follow the rules of the
> management class it is bound to ?
You manage DB2 backups through the 'db
Have you ever had the 3494 configured with serial? You have to make sure
that your ARTIC configuration supports a serial connection and that you are
plugged into the proper host port first. You should be able to follow some
general guidelines in the AIX configuration to get the connection going,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 02:05:53PM +0200, adrian_compton wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone experienced this error before. I have ran a dsmserv auditdb
>
> fix=yes logmode=normal, but still have the server core dumping now and
>
> then
Please give us more information about your server, such a
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:31:46PM -0700, Jon Adams wrote:
> One of our Operations folk had the CAP open while the library was trying
> to eject offsite tapes and it seemed to have failed. Now, we have no
> offsite tapes, so I am trying to find out how to identify the offsite
> tapes for manual re
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:23:33AM -0500, Collins, Brenda wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> Does anyone have a select command that would let me see all the archive logs
> that exist within TSM for a DB2 node ? Somehow they have logs for a
> particular database under two different node names. They don'
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:00:29PM -0400, Curtis Preston wrote:
> I monitor several backup-related mailing lists, and a user on another
> list is getting 7500 Mb/s on his 10 GbE card and was willing to share
> how he did it.
We don't have a back to back 10Gb connection, but we do have 3 1Gb server
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:27:57PM -0600, Schneider, John wrote:
> Greetings,
> We have thousands of 3590, 3592, and LTO tapes which are about
> to be decommissioned when their tape libraries are replaced. Some of the
> 3592 and LTO tapes are only 1-2 years old. Is there any market for used
>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:46:01AM -0800, Mario Behring wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have an EVA Storage that I need to backup because of a hardware upgrade
> that will take place.
>
> I was thinking about using TSM to backup all data on this Storage before the
> EVA hardware upgrade.
>
> My question
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Nancy L Leugemors wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We just upgraded our TSM Server this from 5.5.4.0 to 5.5.5.0 to fix APAR
> IC66116. Since the server upgrade we have experienced several recovery
> log pinning incidents from a few different database backup client
We are attempting to install TSM TDP V5 for Oracle on a Linux system that has
the V6 BA client on it. Is this combination even possible, as it seems there
is a conflict in the V6 installed API, and the one that comes with the V5
TDP? We also don't have Java installed on our production machines so
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:00:09AM -0600, Collins, Brenda wrote:
> The q occ only provides the total space. The select command I was using
> shows actual dates.
>
>
>
> Select node_name,backup_date from backups where node_name='xx'
>
>
>
> This tells me there are backups out there from almost
I have a situation that I can't quite get my head around. It may not be
do-able, however I thought I would ask..
I have a department that wishes to back all of their Windows lab machines
under the name of their main server. It already works, as the NODENAME of
each lab machine has been changed t
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:16:55PM -0500, Ochs, Duane wrote:
> I don't think there is a way to get around the schedule already running
> issue with a single system name for multiple servers. I'm surprised the
> TSM server doesn't balk about multiple backups running with the same
> node name at the
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:30:12PM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
> Your posting doesn't mention potential use of client-node proxy.
> Did you review and discard that facility as not suitable for some
> reason?
When I looked at it, it didn't seem to apply to this situation, or maybe
too complicated fo
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 09:24:49AM -0600, Howard Coles wrote:
> Ladies and Gents, of those of you who run AIX I have a question:
>
> What would cause the wait of the CPU to constantly be this high? (or
>
> what are some of the things) My Disk is barely busy, the NIC which is
>
> etherchanneled in
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:38:11AM -0500, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> As with anything, YMMV.
>
> The "planning guide - current goal for upgrade" is "5GB to 10GB/hr"
Is there any requirement that the 'source' database be fully audited before
the upgrade? Does the upgrade db catch any 'hidden'
(2x) drives
Atape 5.3.9
atldd 4.1.5
Nothing appears in the errpt for the drives after the error.
troubling strangness...
thanks in advance,
Bob Booth
e on the drives, but my CE just
handed me D01D-250, which I hesitate to install until he gives me a 'fix'
list.
Cheers.
Bob Booth
n hearing what others are doing in large capacity
email shops. Are people using appliances? Do they support TSM? Anyone doing
NDMP?
Feel free to reply to me directly. I will not give out names or email
addresses to sales people either!
Thanks in advance!
Bob Booth
University of Illinois - Urbana
I have been seeing many of these messages when backing up a Linux RH 7.2
client to our AIX 4.2.2 server:
ANE4018E (Session: 1254, Node: .x..xxx) Error
processing '/home/gale/CommuniGate/Accounts/ahous.macnt/-
INBOX.mdir/10005-S___-20020
I have had a strange problem that has been following two our our Solaris
boxes. They are both running 5.8 and I had one of the boxes upgrade to
TSM 4.2.2. We fire up the scheduler, and it runs normally, once, then it
stops responding. Netstat shows that the scheduler is listening on 1501, but
t
Shutdown and reboot both send a kill -15 to processes. TSM listens to this
kill signal and shuts itself down. If you have tape activity going, it is
best to stop as much of it as you can, since some threads won't shut down
completely until I/O is completed.
bob
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:01:06
Does anyone know why or where the TSM 4.2.2 clients for some platforms are
now missing from the IBM ftp server? 422 and LATEST are no longer out there
for AIX, Solaris .. Among others..
Whats up?
thanks,
bob
ems with some of the
> 4.2.2. stuff?
>
> David Longo
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/16/02 03:59PM >>>
> I went out there earlier today myself and found what you found too. I'm
> curious too.
>
> Dave Pearson
>
> > -Original Message
Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_
> BJC Health Care|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
> St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
&g
After reading the documentation for the 5.1 clients, I don't believe that
your server level (4.1.X) is supported. As far as I could tell, only 4.2 and
above could be used with the 5.1 clients.
We were seeing the problems with the 4.2.2 clients under UNIX (mainly Linux),
and moved to the 5.1 clie
What is your client type and level, and what is your server level?
I am having this issue with the 5.1 client with various UNIX platforms, and
it does not look like the file is getting backed up.
bob
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:06:36PM +0200, brian welsh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes I see the m
mtlib -l libname -q S
should give you the stats that you want for the total library.
bob
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:03:10PM -0400, Alfred G Welch wrote:
> TSMers,
> I have a 3494 library and need to compile information on
> number of mounts the library has done. It doesn't ha
Check the volume out first, without doing a label check. Insert the volume
and do the label libv. I would do further checking if I were you though. I
think relabling a volume this way will destroy your data, as it may zero
out the index. You don't want to re-initialize the volume, just put on
There are many listed in the archives. Go to www.adsm.org and search on
'show commands'
bob
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:46:27PM -0400, Justin Bleistein wrote:
> Does anyone have a list of all TSM show commands? The only two I know are:
> "show library" and "show dev". Thanks!!!
>
> --Justin Rich
Check your randomize setting with 'q stat'. By default it is 25%.
You can set it with set randomize.
bob
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:33:40PM -0400, Martin, Jon R. wrote:
> The below schedule was scheduled for 1 PM. The client scheduler is
> polling and at 1:05 PM it updated, and said th
Does anyone know off the top of their heads if there is a way to have
the default permissions on the dsmsched and dsmerror logs to something other
than 666 on UNIX? This does not seem to be a umask issue, we have tried that.
thanks,
bob
If you mean 'after a schedule completes', then yes, look into a postschedule
command.
bob
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:19:28PM -0400, Brian Dade wrote:
> I'm running TSM v4.2.1.10 on AIX v4.3.3. I'd like to send e-mail to the
> computer operators so they know when they can log on to continue thei
no.. This is a communication setting. It tells the client not to buffer
small transactions, but to send them to the server right away.
bob
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:26:01PM -0400, Claudio Cofre Caro wrote:
> One question...
>
> If i use in my tsm server "TCPNODELAY = YES"
> then this means
Has anyone heard when an ITSM client will be available for Solaris 9?
We tried to install the latest patch level, and it failed.
thanks,
bob
Workstation Data Save Facility
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 09:21:29AM -0400, William Rosette wrote:
> Thank you Roger for the info. I'm curious about what WDSF stood for?
wrote:
> Bob Booth - UIUC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Has anyone heard when an ITSM client will be available for Solaris 9?
> >
> >We tried to install the latest patch level, and it failed.
>
> Do you mean the install failed? The Solaris install package, as
What signal is killproc() sending to the server main thread? The server will
shutdown gracefully if it gets a SIG 15. See if you send a SIG 15 and the
lock file goes away.
Just a try.
bob
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 03:31:26PM -0400, Scott, Brian wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> Does anyone have a sample s
You may be able to do this with an SNMP trap from the 3494 to an SNMP monitor
station. The 3494 will send interventions to SNMP traphosts, and you can
do whatever you want with them.. email, page, etc.
bob
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:48:44PM -0400, David E Ehresman wrote:
> When the 3494 I/O sta
I asked the same question several weeks ago. I have not yet called
ITSM support on the issue, however, I was able to hack the install script
and Solaris 9 seems to work with no problems (so far).
I will let the list know what support tells me about client support for
Solaris 9.
Good Luck.
bob
What patch level of 5.1 are you running?
I have hesitated going to 5.1 after hearing some of the stories on this list
about 3494 problems, and resource manager timeouts.
thanks,
Bob Booth
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:23:56AM -0400, William Rosette wrote:
> We went from 4.1 to 5.1 and enjo
Hard to tell whats going on. Is this a fresh install of TSM? What version?
What platform is it?
Do a 'q stat' and check to see what your activity log retention period is..
It is possible to set the ACTLOGRETENTION to 0, thereby turning it off.
hope this helps,
bob
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 10:
I have used both on AIX, and really have never seen a difference either way.
I use LVM raw volumes for both, since I find them easier to deal with. TSM
mirrors the database/log volumes, and AIX mirrors the storage pool volumes.
TSM V5 can utilize AIO for JFS under with AIX, and this is a differ
Well, we are in the same boat, however, Mirapoint does not support TSM either,
no matter what they have told you. Depending on how you want to do backups,
you will not be able to restore individual mailboxes until both support
NDMP V4, which is not planned for quite some time.
I hope you have tr
ent solaris machines at random times. The filesystems
are busy, and they can't become unmounted or go away.
Has anyone seen this before?
Server:
AIX 4.3.3 TSM server @4.1.5
Clients:
Solaris 5.7
client version 3.1.8
Thanks,
Bob Booth
I am hoping someone can give some insight into problems I am having getting
the MS SQL TDP V2 to run on a Windows 2K box.
The main problem I am having is with the scheduler. The box runs both
normal backups, and TDP backups via a scheduler service. The TDP options
file lists a separate port '15
Thanks for all who helped with the TDP question I had. I stole the manual from
the Windows adminstrator, figured out what I was supposed to do, then returned
the manual after repeatidly beating him over the head with it..
again, thanks.
This list has always been my greatest resource!
BTW: Any
Again, I am at a loss on this one..
TDP for MS sql 2.2
When the scheduler now runs a differential of the database, this is what the
log shows:
Version 2, Release 2, Level 0.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2001. All rights reserved.
ACO5057I The C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPSql\sqldiff.
Thanks Del for your advice!
Del Hoobler wrote:
This sounds like IC31171. Go here to get the latest TSM API (4.2.1) to fix
it.
(This is the entire client package, and so you may want to just install
the TSM API runtime from that download.)
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-manage
there are only two hosts that are using TDP, and each only has
one database.
Has anyone else had this problem? Is there a correction for it?
AIX 4.3.3 ML08
TSM server 4.1.5 (the problem started happening in 4.1.4, when from 2 to 3).
thanks,
Bob Booth
I had a user come to me today with an error message. On a Solaris 5.8 system
running 4.2.1 client code, they get a
ANS1074I *** User Abort ***
After the backup is completed (after the statistics line).
I looked at the patches, and in 4.2.1.15 I found references to in APARS
resolved from 4.1.2
We have just upgrade our AIX TSM server to 4.2.1.13. Some of our users have
upgraded the clients (AIX and Solaris) to 4.2.1.X (whatever is @LATEST).
A strange thing is happening, for clients using the scheduler, that have
a pre and post schedule command defined. When the scheduler fires off, it
ork for Windows users...
thanks in advance,
Bob Booth
Has anyone heard of an update as to when Tivoli will be supporting MAC OSX?
I can't find anything on the web site...
Thanks,
Bob Booth
UIUC
It looks like your server is running out of memory. Some of the threads
are crashing, and message reading threads can't get started, therefore you
are seeing the Message number errors.
I had simular problems with this on AIX, when we were doing server to server
communications. Restores from
I do it every day. I think you need to have the 'devt=3590' option for
the 3494.
checkin libv libname volname status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no
or
checkin libv libname search=yes status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no
bob
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:01:21PM -0600, Tommy Templeton wrote:
> Does th
checkin libv libname search=yes checkl=yes/no status=scratch
bob
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:30:52PM -0600, Tommy Templeton wrote:
> Hi *SM'ers
>
> Is there a way to check in multiple new volumes (with barcodes) to a 3494 library as
> scratch?
>
> Tommy Templeton
> Senior System Administrator
> D
nt to have to change my TSM setup
at all, since the Legato implementation is brand new, and *better* be temporary.
;-) (sorry, I seem to have something in my eyes that are making them twitch).
Any tips and techniques out there?
Thanks in advance!
Bob Booth
UIUC/CITES
rap my mind around scratch categories, and volume
> management
> between the two applications, and I don't want to have to change my TSM
> setup
> at all, since the Legato implementation is brand new, and *better* be
> temporary.
> ;-) (sorry, I seem to have something in my eyes that are making them
> twitch).
>
> Any tips and techniques out there?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Bob Booth
> UIUC/CITES
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client
Pick your flavor.
bob
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:56:53PM -0500, Wholey, Joseph (TGAMLOL) wrote:
> Can anyone tell me where on the IBM web site I can download the tsm backup archive
> client? w/out having to log in as a re
You were in the right place.
D01F.26E is the latest on the site. Unfortunately, the documentation is
not up to date. I have also heard of newer code for the 3590, but it is
not on any ftp site. You may have to ask your CE to get an FMR tape for you.
bob
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:52:41AM -050
At one point in time, the documentation actually explained that D01F was the
newer track for 3590 MC. I don't know why it reverted back to the old
index.html page. I'll look around for where that document went. Maybe
someone from IBM can get the index updated. ;-)
bob
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 0
My problem was always with bad entries in the recovery log. The only command
I remember was FORMAT, and start over.
Support would always say "I hope you had a backup of your database"
The 'database' was rarely the problem.
bob
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:23:17PM -0500, Justin Bleistein wrote:
>
Guess I don't know enough about Windows objects to figure out what is going
on here. I hope there is some help out there.
I am trying to back up only one folder (and files within) on a Win 2K box.
TSM Client level is 5.1.5
Server level is 4.2.4
Windows OS level is 5.01
The folder I want to bac
As directed from the ref guide, I changed my objects to '"C:\Research Folder\*"'
Now the schedlog shows every file on the machine backing up, so I am back to
where I started.
Do I need a 'virtual mount point' on this windows box, for it to only back up
this one folder?
Any other clues?
thanks,
Could any of you supply your drive firmware level, so we can all compare
notes?
thanks,
bob
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Tom?? Hrouda Ing. wrote:
> We have it on both IBM and Imation tapes (we had first 20 tapes in initial
> order with library from IBM and 20 Imation tapes bought 1/
I am told the only 'client CPU' issues are on pricing of the TDP licenses.
That is what I had to gather to renew my TSM license just a week ago.
bob
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Ryan, Phil wrote:
> I heard that it is only processors on the tsm server not clients
>
> -Original Me
A good resource for aix questions is the following listserv:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is an archive of the list here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=aix-l&r=1&w=2
There is a FAQ here:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/aix-faq
Another resource is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you can sign up www.userblue.or
Wrong 'tsm'. tsm is the module in AIX (SYSV) that is the login broker (it
does getty, and login).
The messages below indicate that something is getting a 'password: ' prompt
but not typing anything or hitting enter before a timeout value.
You are not looking at a TSM (ADSM, WDSF...) problem here
You need to go to the back of the Reference Guide and look at how to add log
space to the server. There is a procedure for recovering the server due to
overcommited log space.
I don't know the answer for the shadow device, but it really isn't the problem
here I believe.
Once the log is extended
ter many tests, it runs just fine. We have run it
on Beta and GA.
I don't think it is officially supported by IBM/Tivoli, but we have found
no problems with it so far and continue to use it.
Bob Booth
UIUC
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 10:26:33AM -0800, Sam Sheppard wrote:
> Due to a legal investigation, I have been asked to 'freeze' the backups
> on one of my client machines. We removed the client from the schedule
> and changed the NODENAME parm in the dsm.opt file to specify a new
> name.
>
> My questi
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:33AM +0800, Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone tell me how can the PATH of my drives be NO on some of my drives
> sometimes when I do 'q path' ? and then .. I am getting ... alot of 'DEVICE
> DEGRADATION' error from the system.
>
> Sequence
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:04:40AM -0600, Miller, Ryan wrote:
> Here's a question from one of my cohorts, since this is our first try at
> this, I thought I would see if I could get any input from anyone else doing
> this.
>
> We have been testing jumbo frames(8990) using TSM on an AIX client. Th
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:40:08PM -0400, David Longo wrote:
> I've been following this thread all day. Without running the script,
> I know I am getting abround 2.5 million objects per hour examined
> and it takes aboput 2.5 hours to run expiration daily. That's this
> week. Last week, it took
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
